ArticleIEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics2022
Control of Magnetic Surgical Robots With Model-Based Simulators and Reinforcement Learning.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Surgical Robotics: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- [Thoughts and Prospects on Precision Control and Intelligent Positioning Robotic Systems Applied in Nasojejunal Feeding Tube Placement].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025Review
- Article
- Model-free control for autonomous prevention of adverse events in robotics.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetically manipulated medical robots are a promising alternative to current robotic platforms, allowing for miniaturization and tetherless actuation. Controlling such systems autonomously may enable safe, accurate operation. However, classical control methods require rigorous models of magnetic fields, robot dynamics, and robot environments, which can be difficult to generate. Model-free reinforcement learning (RL) offers an alternative that can bypass these requirements. We apply RL to a robotic magnetic needle manipulation system. Reinforcement learning algorithms often require long runtimes, making them impractical for many surgical robotics applications, most of which require careful, constant monitoring. Our approach first constructs a model-based simulation (MBS) on guided real-world exploration, learning the dynamics of the environment. After intensive MBS environment training, we transfer the learned behavior from the MBS environment to the real-world. Our MBS method applies RL roughly 200 times faster than doing so in the real world, and achieves a 6 mm root-mean-square (RMS) error for a square reference trajectory. In comparison, pure simulation-based approaches fail to transfer, producing a 31 mm RMS error. These results demonstrate that MBS environments are a good solution for domains where running model-free RL is impractical, especially if an accurate simulation is not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.