Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600465›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in food science2023

Evaluation of nutritional value, bioactivity and mineral content of quinoa bran in China and its potential use in the food industry.

Xueyong Zhou, Ting Yue, Zuofu Wei, Liyan Yang, Lihong Zhang, Baomei Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in food science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xueyong ZhouSchool of Life Science, Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Microbial Application Technologies, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Ting YueSchool of Life Science, Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Microbial Application Technologies, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Zuofu WeiSchool of Life Science, Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Microbial Application Technologies, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Liyan YangSchool of Life Science, Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Microbial Application Technologies, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Lihong ZhangSchool of Life Science, Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Microbial Application Technologies, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030000, China.
Baomei WuSchool of Life Science, Shanxi Engineering Research Center of Microbial Application Technologies, Shanxi Normal University, Shanxi, Taiyuan, 030000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quinoa bran is a by-product during quinoa processing, which is not well used due to its high content of antinutritional factors. The nutritional, antinutritional, antioxidative and mineral content were analyzed in quinoa bran from five producing areas (Hebei, Shanxi, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia and Gansu Province) in China. The results showed that the mean values of protein, starch, fat, fiber, reducing sugar, ash, moisture and energy in quinoa bran were 9.35%, 47.37%, 8.26%, 10.74%, 3.68%, 6.25%, 9.29% and 360.2 kcal/100 g, respectively. Although the protein content in quinoa bran is lower than that in quinoa grain, it is comparable to that in other grains (rice, corn, millet and sorghum) and brans (wheat, oat and rice), so it has the commercial potential to be processed into animal feed or other edible food. The contents of antioxidant flavonoids (460.9 mg/100g) and polyphenols (477.8 mg/100 g) in quinoa bran were higher than those in quinoa grain, suggesting that quinoa bran had better antioxidant capacity. The contents of saponins, tannins and phytic acid in quinoa bran were 18.65, 0.30 and 0.73%, respectively. The content of saponins was nearly one times higher than that in quinoa grain, the contents of tannins and phytic acid, however, were lower than those in quinoa grain. Therefore, the removal of saponins is the key to eliminate the antinutritional properties of quinoa bran. The contents of macroelements (sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, phosphorus) and microelements (iron, manganese, copper, zinc, cobalt, molybdenum, selenium, barium) in quinoa bran were generally higher than those in quinoa grain, which was consistent with the results of ash determination. In summary, quinoa bran was found to be a rich source of nutritional and bioactive components and minerals. If the antinutritional problem can be overcome, quinoa bran has great potential for application in the food industry.

Indexed as

AntinutritionAntioxidantMacroelementMicroelementNutritionQuinoa bran

Identifiers

PMID37600465
PMCPMC10432820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.