Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600447›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular digital health journal2023

Use of a mixed reality system for navigational mapping during cardiac electrophysiological testing does not prolong case duration: A subanalysis from the Cardiac Augmented REality study.

David Bloom, David Catherall, Nathan Miller, Michael K Southworth, Andrew C Glatz, Jonathan R Silva, Jennifer N Avari Silva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular digital health journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Extended reality in cardiovascular care: a systematic review.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David BloomDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
David CatherallSchool of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Nathan MillerPediatric Cardiology/Electrophysiology, St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri.
Michael K SouthworthSentiAR, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri.
Andrew C GlatzDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jonathan R SilvaSentiAR, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri.
Jennifer N Avari SilvaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USSentient Science (United States) · USSt. Louis Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CommandEP™ is a mixed reality (MXR) system for cardiac electrophysiological (EP) procedures that provides a real-time 3-dimensional digital image of cardiac geometry and catheter locations. In a previous study, physicians using the system demonstrated improved navigational accuracy. This study investigated the impact of the CommandEP system on EP procedural times compared to the standard-of-care electroanatomic mapping system (EAMS) display. Objective: The purpose of this retrospective case-controlled analysis was to evaluate the impact of a novel MXR interface on EP procedural times compared to a case-matched cohort. Methods: Cases from the Cardiac Augmented REality (CARE) study were matched for diagnosis and weight using a contemporary cohort. Procedural time was compared from the roll-in and full implementation cohort. During routine EP procedures, operators performed tasks during the postablation waiting phase, including creation of cardiac geometry and 5-point navigation under 2 conditions: (1) EAMS first; and (2) CommandEP. Results: From a total of 16 CARE study patients, the 10 full implementation patients were matched to a cohort of 20 control patients (2 controls:1 CARE, matched according to pathology and age/weight). No statistical difference in total case times between CARE study patients vs control group (118 ± 29 minutes vs 97 ± 20 minutes; Conclusion: MXR did not prolong overall procedural time compared to a matched cohort. There was no prolongation in study task completion time. Future studies with experienced CommandEP users directly assessing procedural time and task completion time in a randomized study population would be of interest.

Indexed as

AccuracyElectrophysiologyFluoroscopyMixed realityProcedural timesVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID37600447
PMCPMC10435945
OpenAlexW4380986775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.