ArticleHeliyon2023
Novel technique for amniotic membrane transplantation for acute Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis patients.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular outcomes of amniotic membrane transplantation in acute and chronic Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review.International ophthalmology · 2026Pooled it
- Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: A Systematic Review of Ophthalmic Management and Treatment.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To report a novel technique to facilitate amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for acute stage Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Design: Laboratory investigation and retrospective, single-center case series. Methods: The polylactic acid (PLA) amniotic fornical ring (AFR) have been successfully manufactured by three-dimensional (3D) printing technology for AMT. This study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 5 SJS/TEN patients at the acute stage between 2019 and 2023. Patients were surgically treated with AFR or sutured amniotic membrane transplant (SAMT). Epidemiology, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), acute ocular severity score, operative duration, epithelial healing time, amniotic dissolution and follow-up time were evaluated. Results: Of all five patients, three patients (6 eyes) received AFR/AMT (Group A), and 2 patients (4 eyes) received SAMT (Group B). There were no significant differences between two groups in the mean preoperative days and vision changes. The mean operation duration was 11.7 ± 3.8 mins in group A. Compared with the SAMT (48.8 ± 5.3 mins), the operation duration was reduced by 76.02%. The mean times for epithelial healing were 32.5 ± 29.2 days in group A and 12.0 ± 0.0 days in group B. In addition, there were no significant side effects of 3D-printed sterile AFR on the eyes. Conclusions: 3D-printed PLA scaffolds could be used as an AFR device for acute SJS/TEN. In addition, personalized 3D-printed AFR is superior to conventional SAMT in operation duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.