Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600350›Full record

ReviewMaterials today. Bio2023

Latest advances: Improving the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of PEEK materials.

Zilin Zhang, Xingmin Zhang, Zhi Zheng, Jingguo Xin, Song Han, Jinwei Qi, Tianhui Zhang, Yongjie Wang, Shaokun Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zilin ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Xingmin ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Zhi ZhengDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Jingguo XinDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Song HanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Jinwei QiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Tianhui ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Yongjie WangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Shaokun ZhangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Center of Orthopedics, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excellent biocompatibility, mechanical properties, chemical stability, and elastic modulus close to bone tissue make polyetheretherketone (PEEK) a promising orthopedic implant material. However, biological inertness has hindered the clinical applications of PEEK. The immune responses and inflammatory reactions after implantation would interfere with the osteogenic process. Eventually, the proliferation of fibrous tissue and the formation of fibrous capsules would result in a loose connection between PEEK and bone, leading to implantation failure. Previous studies focused on improving the osteogenic properties and antibacterial ability of PEEK with various modification techniques. However, few studies have been conducted on the immunomodulatory capacity of PEEK. New clinical applications and advances in processing technology, research, and reports on the immunomodulatory capacity of PEEK have received increasing attention in recent years. Researchers have designed numerous modification techniques, including drug delivery systems, surface chemical modifications, and surface porous treatments, to modulate the post-implantation immune response to address the regulatory factors of the mechanism. These studies provide essential ideas and technical preconditions for the development and research of the next generation of PEEK biological implant materials. This paper summarizes the mechanism by which the immune response after PEEK implantation leads to fibrous capsule formation; it also focuses on modification techniques to improve the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory abilities of PEEK. We also discuss the limitations of the existing modification techniques and present the corresponding future perspectives.

Indexed as

Anti-inflammatoryBiological inertnessImmunoregulationModificationPolyetheretherketone

Identifiers

PMID37600350
PMCPMC10432209
OpenAlexW4385383217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.