Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600107›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2022

Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV, Grade 1 and 2, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Study.

Josefine Kjaer, Thomas E Clancy, Anders Thornell, Niklas Andersson, Per Hellman, Joakim Crona, Staffan Welin, Megan Sulciner, Brittany Powell, Lauren Brais and 6 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Erratum: Benefit of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV, Grade 1 and 2, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors:Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Josefine KjaerFrom the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Thomas E ClancyDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Anders ThornellDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Niklas AnderssonDepartment of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per HellmanFrom the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Joakim CronaDepartment of Medical sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Staffan WelinDepartment of Medical sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Megan SulcinerDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Brittany PowellDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Lauren BraisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Kristina AstoneDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
William BaddooDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Gerhard DohertyDepartment of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Jennifer A ChanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Olov NorlénFrom the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Peter StålbergFrom the Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association of primary tumor resection in stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NET) and survival in a propensity-score matched study. Background: Pan-NET are often diagnosed with stage IV disease. The oncologic benefit from primary tumor resection in this scenario is debated and previous studies show contradictory results. Methods: Patients from 3 tertiary referral centers from January 1, 1985, through December 31, 2019: Uppsala University Hospital (Uppsala, Sweden), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden), and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, USA) were assessed for eligibility. Patients with sporadic, grade 1 and 2, stage IV pan-NET, with baseline 2000-2019 were divided between those undergoing primary tumor resection combined with oncologic treatment (surgery group [SG]), and those who received oncologic treatment without primary tumor resection (non-SG). A propensity-score matching was performed to account for the variability in the extent of metastatic disease and comorbidity. Primary outcome was overall survival. Results: Patients with stage IV Pan-NET (n = 733) were assessed for eligibility, 194 were included. Patients were divided into a SG (n = 65) and a non-SG (n = 129). Two isonumerical groups with 50 patients in each group remained after propensity-score matching. The 5-year survival was 65.4% (95% CI, 51.5-79.3) in the matched SG and 47.8% (95% CI, 30.6-65.0) in the matched non-SG (log-rank, Conclusions: Resection of the primary tumor in patients with stage IV Pan-NET and G1/G2 grade was associated with prolonged overall survival compared to nonoperative management. A surgically aggressive regime should be considered where resection is not contraindicated.

Identifiers

PMID37600107
PMCPMC10431300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.