ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2022
Using Augmented Reality for Intraoperative Guidance During Sacral Neuromodulation System Implantation.
Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proof of Concept: Extended Reality-Assisted Resternotomy Planning for Complex Cardiac Surgery.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Pilot study on the application of augmented reality navigation for sacral neuromodulation and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation.Neurosurgical review · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of using augmented reality during lead placement for sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Methods: The study was a prospective case series performed in a single tertiary center. Patients with fecal incontinence or urinary retention eligible for SNS according to the American society of colon and rectal surgeon's guidelines were included. Each patient underwent a computerized tomography scan of the sacrum and pelvic floor before surgery; and a segmentation of the sacral bone, the skin, and three fiducial markers on the lower back was produced. Surgical planning included the design of an ideal virtual transmission tract leading to the S3 foramen using the most suitable location and needle trajectory for introducing the lead. During the surgical intervention, a needle was inserted into the S3 foramen using the aligned tract as visualized using the Microsoft HoloLens first generation head mounted unit. Results: Overall, 11 patients were included. Mean operative time was 43.8 minutes (range 25-81 minutes). All patients reported a significant reduction from the preoperative level of the mean postoperative Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCIS) assessed 2 weeks after the temporary SNS implant (CCIS preoperative 13.3, postoperative 8.5; CI -7.35 to -2.25; Conclusions: Intraoperative augmented reality imaging for needle application during SNS appears to be feasible, practical, and may be useful in additional procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.