Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600073›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2023

Evaluating the predictive ability of natural language processing in identifying tertiary/quaternary cases in prioritization workflows for interhospital transfer.

Timothy Lee, Paul J Lukac, Sitaram Vangala, Kamran Kowsari, Vu Vu, Spencer Fogelman, Michael A Pfeffer, Douglas S Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Timothy LeeAltamed Health Services, Commerce, CA, United States.
Paul J LukacDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3315-6613
Sitaram VangalaDepartment of Medicine Statistics Core, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Kamran KowsariOffice of Health Informatics and Analytics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Vu VuOffice of Health Informatics and Analytics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Spencer FogelmanNationwide Insurance, Scottsdale, AZ, United States.
Michael A PfefferDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Douglas S BellDepartment of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001883 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEX BUI, Nina Thawata Harawa · 2016 to 2026
$8.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001883NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Tertiary and quaternary (TQ) care refers to complex cases requiring highly specialized health services. Our study aimed to compare the ability of a natural language processing (NLP) model to an existing human workflow in predictively identifying TQ cases for transfer requests to an academic health center. Materials and methods: Data on interhospital transfers were queried from the electronic health record for the 6-month period from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. The NLP model was allowed to generate predictions on the same cases as the human predictive workflow during the study period. These predictions were then retrospectively compared to the true TQ outcomes. Results: There were 1895 transfer cases labeled by both the human predictive workflow and the NLP model, all of which had retrospective confirmation of the true TQ label. The NLP model receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve of 0.91. Using a model probability threshold of ≥0.3 to be considered TQ positive, accuracy was 81.5% for the NLP model versus 80.3% for the human predictions ( Discussion: The NLP model was as accurate as the human workflow but significantly more sensitive. This translated to 15.9% more TQ cases identified by the NLP model. Conclusion: Integrating an NLP model into existing workflows as automated decision support could translate to more TQ cases identified at the onset of the transfer process.

Indexed as

clinicalcomputer-assisted decision makingdecision support systemsmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37600073
PMCPMC10435371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.