Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37600003›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2023

Clinical applications of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury: a systematic review.

Meredith C Costello, Emily L Errante, Taylor Smartz, Wilson Z Ray, Allan D Levi, Stephen Shelby Burks

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07074392 (Assessing the Feasibility and Effect of Post-operative Electrical Stimulation on Spinal Accessory Nerve Recovery After Neck Dissection for Head and Neck Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07074392 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Feasibility and Effect of Post-operative Electrical Stimulation on Spinal Accessory Nerve Recovery After Neck Dissection for Head and Neck Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled38ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer, Nerve Injury, Neck DissectionArmsElectrical Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. A review of new developments in peripheral nerve regeneration.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2026
    Review
  5. Peripheral nerve repair: innovations and future directions.Journal of translational medicine · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith C CostelloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Emily L ErranteDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Taylor SmartzDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Wilson Z RayDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Allan D LeviDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Stephen Shelby BurksDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, United States.
Neurological Surgery · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Peripheral nerve injuries are common neurologic injuries that are challenging to treat with current therapies. Electrical stimulation has been shown to accelerate reinnervation and enhance functional recovery. This study aims to review the literature on clinical application of electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury. Methods: PubMed and Embase were sourced from 1995 to August 2022. Selection was based on predetermined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Eight hundred and thirty-five articles were screened with seven being included in this review. Results: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients with peripheral nerve injuries were represented. Six of the studies were randomized controlled trials. A variety of nerve injuries were represented with all being in the upper extremity and supraclavicular region. Electrical stimulation protocols and evaluation varied. Electrodes were implanted in four studies with one also implanting the stimulator. Length of stimulation per session was either 20 mins or 1 h. Median stimulation frequency was 20 Hz. Stimulation intensity varied from 3 to 30V; pulse width ranged from 0.1 to 1.007 ms. Three protocols were conducted immediately after surgery. Patients were followed for an average of 13.5 months and were evaluated using electrophysiology and combinations of motor, sensory, and functional criteria. Discussion: Patients who received electrical stimulation consistently demonstrated better recovery compared to their respective controls. Electrical stimulation for peripheral nerve injury is a novel treatment that has not been well-studied in humans. Our review illustrates the potential benefit in implementing this approach into everyday practice. Future research should aim to optimize protocol for clinical use.

Indexed as

clinical applicationelectrical stimulationperipheral nerve injuryrecoveryreinnervation

Identifiers

PMID37600003
PMCPMC10435250
OpenAlexW4385554015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.