ArticleACS omega2023
Rapid Visual LAMP Method for Detection of Genetically Modified Organisms.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ladder-shape melting temperature isothermal amplification methods for detection of CaMV 35S and CP4 EPSPS genes in soybean foods.Transgenic research · 2026Article
- Shedding light on deception: LAMP as a tool for detecting adulterants in herbal medicine.Protoplasma · 2026Review
- Advanced Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensing of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Products.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Future perspectives of GMO detection in agriculture: strategies for electrochemical nucleic acid detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We developed a novel loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method using DNA captured on polyacrylamide microparticles (PAMMPs) as templates (PAMMPs@DNA-LAMP) for rapid qualitative detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Here, DNA was extracted by a fast and cost-effective method using PAMMPs. Four LAMP primers were designed for the PAMMPs@DNA-LAMP method to detect the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV35S) promotor in GMOs. We thus developed this method for rapid extraction of DNA (5-10 min) and fast amplification of DNA within ∼30 min at a constant temperature of 63 °C. Moreover, the DNA captured by PAMMPs (PAMMPs@DNA) could be effectively detected by both conventional and quantitative PCR (qPCR) and LAMP. The PAMMPs@DNA-LAMP method was validated with high specificity, sensitivity, and performance for practical sample analysis. This assay detected 0.01% target sequences, which had a high specificity like qPCR and better than the conventional PCR (cPCR). Furthermore, PAMMPs@DNA-LAMP was successfully used to extract and detect DNA from food samples of the major crops (soybean, maize, rice, etc.). In summary, a novel PAMMPs@DNA-LAMP assay has been developed, which has higher sensitivity and spends less time than the cPCR detection using the conventional DNA extracted process. This method offers a novel approach for rapid detection of GMOs in the field.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.