Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599945›Full record

ArticleACS omega2023

Comparison of Ureteral Stent Biomaterials: Encrustation Profile in Lithogenic Artificial Urine Models.

Yi X Wu, Eric J Choi, Amberly A Vu, Pengbo Jiang, Sohrab N Ali, Roshan M Patel, Jaime Landman, Ralph V Clayman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal artificial urine formulations forFrontiers in urology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yi X WuDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7833-1481
Eric J ChoiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, Irvine 92697, California, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3287-1284
Amberly A VuDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.
Pengbo JiangDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.
Sohrab N AliDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.
Roshan M PatelDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.
Jaime LandmanDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.
Ralph V ClaymanDepartment of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange 92868, California, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral stent encrustation significantly limits indwelling time and can lead to downstream urological problems. However, no ideal polymeric biomaterials have been shown to completely resist encrustation in long-term urine exposure. Recently, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-coated Pellethane was reported as a promising biomaterial resistant to encrustation. This study compared HEMA-coated Pellethane to commercially available stents under two different artificial urine environments. To evaluate the degree and composition of encrustation on HEMA-coated Pellethane, Boston Scientific Tria, Bard InLay Optima, Cook Universa Hydrogel, and Cook Black Silicone stents were used at various dwelling times in two different artificial urine environments. In a batch-flow model, samples of stents were suspended in an artificial urine solution (AUS) at 37 °C. Every 24 h for 11 weeks, 50% of the AUS would be replaced with fresh components using a programmable peristaltic pump system. The stent materials were removed at suitable time intervals and air-dried for 24 h under sterile conditions before follow-up analysis. SEM was used to assess the degree of encrustation, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was employed to quantify the encrusted compositions, specifically for calcium, magnesium, and phosphorus. We measured the weight gain over time due to encrusted deposits on the stents and quantified the amount of Ca, Mg, and P deposited on each encrusted stent. After the 11 week trial, HEMA-coated Pellethane showed the most average mass change. SEM showed that HEMA-coated Pellethane was fully encrusted in just 2 weeks in the AUS environments, and ICP-MS showed that Ca is the most abundant deposit. Among all the tested stents, Black Silicone performed the best. The two AUSs were formulated to encrust more rapidly than physiological conditions. HEMA-coated Pellethane is not an ideal stent material, while silicone is a promising material for advancing ureteral stents.

Identifiers

PMID37599945
PMCPMC10433332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.