Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599927›Full record

ReviewACS omega2023

A Review on Edible Coatings and Films: Advances, Composition, Production Methods, and Safety Concerns.

Anam Matloob, Hudda Ayub, Muhammad Mohsin, Saadia Ambreen, Faima Atta Khan, Sadaf Oranab, Muhammad Abdul Rahim, Waseem Khalid, Gulzar Ahmad Nayik, Seema Ramniwas and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anam MatloobNational Institute of Food Science & Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Hudda AyubNational Institute of Food Science & Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Muhammad MohsinNational Institute of Food Science & Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38000, Pakistan.
Saadia AmbreenUniversity Institute of Food Science and Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Faima Atta KhanDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Science, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Sadaf OranabDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Muhammad Abdul RahimDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Life Science, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan.
Waseem KhalidUniversity Institute of Food Science and Technology, The University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan.
Gulzar Ahmad NayikDepartment of Food Science & Technology, Government Degree College Shopian Gagran 192303, Jammu and Kashmir, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-5936
Seema RamniwasUniversity Centre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Gharuan, Mohali 140413, Punjab India.
Sezai ErcisliDepartment of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ataturk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.
Government College University, Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Agriculture Faisalabad · PKUniversity of Lahore · PKChandigarh University · INErzurum Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food is a crucial source for the endurance of individuals, and quality concerns of consumers are being raised with the progression of time. Edible coatings and films (ECFs) are increasingly important in biobased packaging because they have a prime role in enhancing the organoleptic characteristics of the food products and minimizing the spread of microorganisms. These sustainable ingredients are crucial for a safer and healthier environment. These are created from proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, plasticizers, emulsifiers, and active substances. These are eco-friendly since made from innocuous material. Nanocomposite films are also beginning to be developed and support networks of biological polymers. Antioxidant, flavoring, and coloring compounds can be employed to improve the quality, wellbeing, and stability of packaged foods. Gelatin-enhanced fruit and vegetable-based ECFs compositions have the potential to produce biodegradable films. Root plants like cassava, potato, and sweet potato have been employed to create edible films and coatings. Achira flour, amylum, yam, ulluco, and water chestnut have all been considered as novel film-forming ingredients. The physical properties of biopolymers are influenced by the characteristics, biochemical confirmation, compatibility, relative humidity, temperature, water resistance, and application procedures of the components. ECFs must adhere to all regulations governing food safety and be generally recognized as safe (GRAS). This review covers the new advancements in ECFs regarding the commitment of novel components to the improvement of their properties. It is expected that ECFs can be further investigated to provide innovative components and strategies that are helpful for global financial issues and the environment.

Identifiers

PMID37599927
PMCPMC10433350
OpenAlexW4385497330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.