Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599896›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023

Clinical Implications of Peak Inspiratory Flow in COPD: Post Hoc Analyses of the TRONARTO Study.

Donald A Mahler, Henrik Watz, Rachel Emerson-Stadler, John Ritz, Asparuh Gardev, Asif Shaikh, M Bradley Drummond

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Donald A MahlerGeisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6332-4895
Henrik WatzPulmonary Research Institute at LungenClinic Grosshansdorf, Grosshansdorf, Germany.
Rachel Emerson-StadlerBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
John RitzSyneos Health, Somerset, NJ, USA.
Asparuh GardevBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Asif ShaikhBoehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ridgefield, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5116-9338
M Bradley DrummondPulmonary Diseases and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-4610
Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) · DEBoehringer Ingelheim (United States) · USDartmouth College · USLungenClinic Grosshansdorf · DESyneos Health (United States) · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In patients with COPD, inhalation ability should be assessed when considering inhaler choice. To evaluate whether the soft mist inhaler (SMI) is suitable for COPD patients irrespective of inhalation ability, the TRONARTO study investigated the efficacy of dual long-acting bronchodilator therapy delivered via the Respimat Methods: This congress compilation summarizes post hoc analyses from the TRONARTO study presented at the annual American Thoracic Society 2022 and European Respiratory Society 2022 meetings. These analyses evaluated PIF in over 200 patients, with PIF measurements taken daily at home for 4 weeks, and in the clinic at baseline, Weeks 2 and 4. Results: Overall, 57.9% of patients had a PIF range (difference between lowest and highest PIF measurements) <20 L/min (12.4% of patients had PIF range <10 L/min). At-home PIF range decreased over the study period, suggesting that inhaler training/repeated PIF measurements may help to make patients' inspiratory effort more consistent. Some patient characteristics correlated with lower PIF (female gender, shorter stature, more severe disease, worse airflow obstruction) and lower PIF range (more severe disease). PIF measurements differed between medium-low and high-resistance settings, highlighting the importance of measuring PIF at the resistance of a patient's inhaler. PIF correlated poorly with spirometry measurements. Conclusion: As indicated in COPD management guidelines, choice of inhaler is essential to optimize pharmacologic therapies for COPD. Poor inspiratory ability should be viewed as a treatable trait that can help to inform inhaler choice. Inhaler training and consideration of PIF (if patients use a dry powder inhaler) can reduce patient-to-inhaler mismatch, with potential consequences for health status and exacerbation risk.

Indexed as

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveDry Powder InhalersFemaleHealth StatusHumansPhenotypeRespiratory RatecharacteristicscongressCOPDDPIdry powder inhalerPIFsuboptimalvariability

Identifiers

PMID37599896
PMCPMC10432827
OpenAlexW4385689598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.