ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023
Identifying circulating biomarkers for major depressive disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antidepressant Effects of 20-Glucoginsenoside Rf in an L-AAA-Induced Mouse Model with Glial-Associated Molecular Alterations.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Identification of AICD-associated transcriptomic markers in major depressive disorder.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Associations between self-reported symptoms and circulating protein biomarkers: A scoping review protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- Integrative analysis identifies DCBLD2 and immune-related biomarkers for major depressive disorder: evidence from human peripheral blood, post-mortem brain, and rat models.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Towards Objective Major Depressive Disorder Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Biomarkers.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2025Review
- Review
- Cytokine-Related Genes and Inflammatory Profiles as Potential Biomarkers in Major Depressive Disorder.Psychiatry investigation · 2025Article
- From inflammation to depression: key biomarkers for IBD-related major depressive disorder.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- Antidepressant Effects of Ginsenoside Rc on L-Alpha-Aminoadipic Acid-Induced Astrocytic Ablation and Neuroinflammation in Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Proteomic profiles of cytokines and chemokines in moderate to severe depression: Implications for comorbidities and biomarker discovery.Brain, behavior, & immunity - health · 2024Article
- B cells and the stressed brain: emerging evidence of neuroimmune interactions in the context of psychosocial stress and major depression.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2024Review
- Bioinformatics and systems biology approach to identify the pathogenetic link of neurological pain and major depressive disorder.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To date, the current diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) still depends on clinical symptomatologic criteria, misdiagnosis and ineffective treatment are common. The study aimed to explore circulating biomarkers for MDD diagnosis. Methods: A high-throughput antibody array technology was utilized to detect 440 circulating cytokines in eight MDD patients and eight age-and gender-matched healthy controls. LASSO regression was conducted for MDD-related characteristic proteins selection. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to validate the characteristic proteins in 40 MDD patients and 40 healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to evaluate the diagnostic values of characteristic proteins for discriminating MDD patients from healthy controls. Correlations between the levels of characteristic proteins and depression severity (HAMD-17 scores) were evaluated using linear regression. Results: The levels of 59 proteins were found aberrant in MDD patients compared with healthy controls. LASSO regression found six MDD-related characteristic proteins including insulin, CD40L, CD155, Lipocalin-2, HGF and LIGHT. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve (AUC) values of six characteristic proteins were more than 0.85 in discriminating patients with MDD from healthy controls. Furthermore, significant relationship was found between the levels of insulin, CD155, Lipocalin-2, HGF, LIGHT and HAMD-17 scores in MDD group. Conclusion: These results suggested that six characteristic proteins screened from 59 proteins differential in MDD may hold promise as diagnostic biomarkers in discriminating patients with MDD. Among six characteristic proteins, insulin, CD155, Lipocalin-2, HGF and LIGHT might be useful to estimate the severity of depressive symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.