ArticleEvolution, medicine, and public health2023
Biomarkers or biotargets? Using competition to lure cancer cells into evolutionary traps.
Article in Evolution, medicine, and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- ASF1A: A versatile histone chaperone bridging chromatin dynamics, disease mechanisms and clinical potential (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Review
- TRIM47: molecular characteristics, disease-related mechanisms, and clinical translational value.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Cancer biomarkers provide information on the characteristics and extent of cancer progression and help inform clinical decision-making. However, they can also play functional roles in oncogenesis, from enabling metastases and inducing angiogenesis to promoting resistance to chemotherapy. The resulting evolution could bias estimates of cancer progression and lead to suboptimal treatment decisions. Methodology: We create an evolutionary game theoretic model of cell-cell competition among cancer cells with different levels of biomarker production. We design and simulate therapies on top of this pre-existing game and examine population and biomarker dynamics. Results: Using total biomarker as a proxy for population size generally underestimates chemotherapy efficacy and overestimates targeted therapy efficacy. If biomarker production promotes resistance and a targeted therapy against the biomarker exists, this dynamic can be used to set an evolutionary trap. After chemotherapy selects for a high biomarker-producing cancer cell population, targeted therapy could be highly effective for cancer extinction. Rather than using the most effective therapy given the cancer's current biomarker level and population size, it is more effective to 'overshoot' and utilize an evolutionary trap when the aim is extinction. Increasing cell-cell competition, as influenced by biomarker levels, can help prime and set these traps. Conclusion and Implications: Evolution of functional biomarkers amplify the limitations of using total biomarker levels as a measure of tumor size when designing therapeutic protocols. Evolutionarily enlightened therapeutic strategies may be highly effective, assuming a targeted therapy against the biomarker is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.