Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599816›Full record

ArticleNorth American Spine Society journal2023

The use of deep learning in medical imaging to improve spine care: A scoping review of current literature and clinical applications.

Caroline Constant, Carl-Eric Aubin, Hilal Maradit Kremers, Diana V Vera Garcia, Cody C Wyles, Pouria Rouzrokh, Annalise Noelle Larson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in North American Spine Society journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline ConstantOrthopedic Surgery AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, United States.
Carl-Eric AubinPolytechnique Montreal, 2500 Chem. de Polytechnique, Montréal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Hilal Maradit KremersOrthopedic Surgery AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, United States.
Diana V Vera GarciaOrthopedic Surgery AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, United States.
Cody C WylesOrthopedic Surgery AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, United States.
Pouria RouzrokhOrthopedic Surgery AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, United States.
Annalise Noelle LarsonOrthopedic Surgery AI Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55902, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence is a revolutionary technology that promises to assist clinicians in improving patient care. In radiology, deep learning (DL) is widely used in clinical decision aids due to its ability to analyze complex patterns and images. It allows for rapid, enhanced data, and imaging analysis, from diagnosis to outcome prediction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the current literature and clinical utilization of DL in spine imaging. Methods: This study is a scoping review and utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to review the scientific literature from 2012 to 2021. A search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embased, and IEEE Xplore databases with syntax specific for DL and medical imaging in spine care applications was conducted to collect all original publications on the subject. Specific data was extracted from the available literature, including algorithm application, algorithms tested, database type and size, algorithm training method, and outcome of interest. Results: A total of 365 studies (total sample of 232,394 patients) were included and grouped into 4 general applications: diagnostic tools, clinical decision support tools, automated clinical/instrumentation assessment, and clinical outcome prediction. Notable disparities exist in the selected algorithms and the training across multiple disparate databases. The most frequently used algorithms were U-Net and ResNet. A DL model was developed and validated in 92% of included studies, while a pre-existing DL model was investigated in 8%. Of all developed models, only 15% of them have been externally validated. Conclusions: Based on this scoping review, DL in spine imaging is used in a broad range of clinical applications, particularly for diagnosing spinal conditions. There is a wide variety of DL algorithms, database characteristics, and training methods. Future studies should focus on external validation of existing models before bringing them into clinical use.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceClinical careDeep learningImagingMachine learningReviewSpine

Identifiers

PMID37599816
PMCPMC10432249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.