Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599767›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Impaired decision-making in borderline personality disorder.

Bettina Bajzát, Péter Soltész, Klára Soltész-Várhelyi, Evelyn Erika Lévay, Zsolt Szabolcs Unoka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bettina BajzátDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of General Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter SoltészDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of General Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Klára Soltész-VárhelyiDepartment of General Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Budapest, Hungary.
Evelyn Erika LévayDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of General Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt Szabolcs UnokaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Faculty of General Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Semmelweis University · HUPázmány Péter Catholic University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex mental disorder with core symptoms like interpersonal instability, emotion dysregulation, self-harm, and impulsive decision-making. Previous neuropsychological studies have found impairment in the decision-making of patients with BPD related to impulsivity. In our study, we focus on a better, more nuanced understanding of impulsive decision-making in BPD with the help of Rogers' decision-making test that simulates a gambling situation. Methods: A novelty of our study is that we excluded from further analysis non-compliant participants based on their performance. Outlier participants on the measures proportion of good choices and average of wager choice number were filtered out to represent the population that understood the basic premise of the task and showed minimal motivation to gain rewards. Thus participants often choosing the less likely color or frequently choosing the first bet amount available (to probably speed up the test) were omitted from further analysis. Another novelty is that we assessed and reported six variables that examine Deliberation Time, Quality of Decision, Risk-taking, Overall proportion bet, Delay aversion, and Risk adjustment. Forty-three women with BPD participated in the study, and 16 non-compliant were excluded. As for the healthy control group, 42 women participated in the study, and four non-compliant were excluded. Thus, we compared the data of 27 patients with BPD with 38 healthy controls. Results: Our results show that there are significant differences amongst the groups regarding the Quality of Decision Making ( Discussion: Our results show that the two groups use different decision-making strategies that can have various associations with everyday life situations.

Indexed as

borderline personality disordersdecision-makingexclusion criteria based on compliance with the testimpulsivityneuropsychologyrisk-taking

Identifiers

PMID37599767
PMCPMC10436614
OpenAlexW4385579582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.