Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599751›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Initial examination of the mental health disorders: screening instrument for athletes.

Brad Donohue, Jesse Scott, Grace Goodwin, Kimberly A Barchard, Greg Bohall, Daniel N Allen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brad DonohueDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Jesse ScottDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Grace GoodwinDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Kimberly A BarchardDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
Greg BohallThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology, Chicago, IL, United States.
Daniel N AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
University of Nevada, Las Vegas · USThe Chicago School of Professional Psychology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is a need to psychometrically develop assessment instruments capable of screening mental health disorders in athlete populations. The current study was conducted to determine reliability, validity and clinical utility of the Mental Health Disorders Screening Instrument for Athletes (MHDSIA). Methods and results: 259 collegiate athletes completed the MHDSIA. Factor analysis determined a single factor with good internal consistency, and this factor was positively correlated with an established measure of psychiatric symptomology (Symptom Checklist 90-R), demonstrating its concurrent validity. An optimum clinical cutoff score (i.e., 32) was determined using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analyses to assist appropriate mental health referrals. Discussion: Results suggest the MHSIA is a reliable, valid, and relatively quick and easy to interpret screen for the broad spectrum of mental health disorders in collegiate athletes. As expected, NCAA athletes reported lower MHDSIA scores than club and intramural athletes, while males reported similar severity scores as females.

Indexed as

athleteclinical utilityfactor analysismental health assessmentmental health disorders screening instrument for athletesmental health screenreferralsport

Identifiers

PMID37599751
PMCPMC10436329
OpenAlexW4385583739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.