Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599386›Full record

ReviewCell transplantation

A Technological and Regulatory Review on Human-Animal Chimera Research: The Current Landscape of Biology, Law, and Public Opinion.

Jennifer L Brown, Joseph P Voth, Kennedy Person, Walter C Low

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The use of transgenic animals for xenotransplantation: An update.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Unlocking the code for stroke treatment and care.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer L BrownGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7525-5986
Joseph P VothDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kennedy PersonGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Walter C LowGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8593-0175
University of Minnesota · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Neurobehavior, Neuropathology, and Risk Factors in Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG052354 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Brian C. Kraemer, ELAINE R. PESKIND · 2016 to 2026
$6.7M
Predoctoral Training of NeuroscientistsT32NS105604 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI A DAVID REDISH · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
The sex-specific role of alpha-synucleinF31NS125963 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BROWN, JENNIFER LYNN · 2022 to 2023
$42k
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG052354NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS125963NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS105604
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Organ transplantation is a highly utilized treatment for many medical conditions, yet the number of patients waiting for organs far exceeds the number available. The challenges and limitations currently associated with organ transplantation and technological advances in gene editing techniques have led scientists to pursue alternate solutions to the donor organ shortage. Growing human organs in animals and harvesting those organs for transplantation into humans is one such solution. These chimeric animals usually have certain genes necessary for a specific organ's development inhibited at an early developmental stage, followed by the addition of cultured pluripotent human cells to fill that developmental niche. The result is a chimeric animal that contains human organs which are available for transplant into a patient, circumventing some of the limitations currently involved in donor organ transplantation. In this review, we will discuss both the current scientific and legal landscape of human-animal chimera (HAC) research. We present an overview of the technological advances that allow for the creation of HACs, the patents that currently exist on these methods, as well as current public attitude and understanding that can influence HAC research policy. We complement our scientific and public attitude discussion with a regulatory overview of chimera research at both the national and state level, while also contrasting current U.S. legislation with regulations in other countries. Overall, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the legal and scientific barriers to conducting research on HACs for the generation of transplantable human organs, as well as provide recommendations for the future.

Indexed as

Organ TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAnimalsBiologyHumansPublic OpinionTissue Donorschimera lawchimerasexogenic organs and cellshuman–animal hybridsorgan transplantationpatentspublic opinionregulation

Identifiers

PMID37599386
PMCPMC10467371
OpenAlexW4386020039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.