Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599380›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2023

Bearded or smooth? Awns improve yield when wheat experiences heat stress during grain fill in the southeastern United States.

Noah DeWitt, Jeanette Lyerly, Mohammed Guedira, James B Holland, J Paul Murphy, Brian P Ward, Richard E Boyles, Mohamed Mergoum, Md Ali Babar, Ehsan Shakiba and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Epistatic interaction of the genesbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. A pendant awn phenotype linked to the EMBRYONIC FLOWER 1 LIKE (EMF1L) gene in barley.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Noah DeWittSchool of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9055-993X
Jeanette LyerlyDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3853-9581
Mohammed GuediraDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3953-6112
James B HollandDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-9675
J Paul MurphyDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Brian P WardForage Genetics International, West Salem, WI 54669, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-7934
Richard E BoylesPee Dee Research and Education Center, Clemson University, Florence, SC 29506, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1366-7659
Mohamed MergoumCrop and Soil Sciences Department/Institute of Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Md Ali BabarAgronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9951-6856
Ehsan ShakibaDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7264-6351
Russel SuttonAgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Amir IbrahimAgriLife Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0584-753X
Vijay TiwariDepartment of Plant Science and Landscape Architecture, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Nicholas SantantonioDepartment Of Crop and Soil Environmental Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-4023
David A Van SanfordDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Kimberly HowellPlant Science Research, USDA-ARS SEA, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Jared H SmithPlant Science Research, USDA-ARS SEA, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Stephen A HarrisonSchool of Plant, Environmental and Soil Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Gina Brown-GuediraDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-2827

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant 67007-25939Georgia Seed DevelopmentNIFAUniversity of Georgia Research FoundationUSDA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence or absence of awns-whether wheat heads are 'bearded' or 'smooth' - is the most visible phenotype distinguishing wheat cultivars. Previous studies suggest that awns may improve yields in heat or water-stressed environments, but the exact contribution of awns to yield differences remains unclear. Here we leverage historical phenotypic, genotypic, and climate data for wheat (Triticum aestivum) to estimate the yield effects of awns under different environmental conditions over a 12-year period in the southeastern USA. Lines were classified as awned or awnless based on sequence data, and observed heading dates were used to associate grain fill periods of each line in each environment with climatic data and grain yield. In most environments, awn suppression was associated with higher yields, but awns were associated with better performance in heat-stressed environments more common at southern locations. Wheat breeders in environments where awns are only beneficial in some years may consider selection for awned lines to reduce year-to-year yield variability, and with an eye towards future climates.

Indexed as

Edible GrainTriticumHeat-Shock ResponsePhenotypeSoutheastern United Statesabiotic stressAwnsgxephenologyreaction normwheat

Identifiers

PMID37599380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.