Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37599293›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2023

The efficacy of a novel SWEEPS laser-activated irrigation compared to ultrasonic activation in the removal of pulp tissue from an isthmus area in the apical third of the root canal.

Ivona Bago, Adriana Đurin, Debora Kanižaj, Lovorka Batelja Vuletić, Ivana Vidović Zdrilić, Ivica Anić

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivona BagoDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Croatia. bago@sfzg.hr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5938-4940
Adriana ĐurinDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Croatia.
Debora KanižajDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Croatia.
Lovorka Batelja VuletićDepartment of Pathology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana Vidović ZdrilićDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.
Ivica AnićDepartment of Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, Gundulićeva 5, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HRUniversity of Rijeka · HR

Funding

Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost 5303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Shock Wave Enhanced Emission Photoacoustic Streaming (SWEEPS) in the removal of remaining pulp tissue from the root canal isthmus area in lower molars and compare it with ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) and conventional needle irrigation (NI). Forty-one lower molars with isthmuses between mesial canals were included in the study. The teeth were randomly distributed into experimental groups (n = 12/each) based on the final irrigation protocol (SWEEPS, UAI, or NI) and a control group (C) (n = 5). The traditional access cavity of the mesial part of each tooth was made in all samples. The mesial root canals in the experimental groups were instrumented with a Wave One Gold Primary (25/.07) file using 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) while the distal canal served as a control for the presence of pulp tissue. No treatment was performed in the C group. Sections from the isthmus region were processed for histopathology to measure the remaining pulp tissue (RPT). The results were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05). There were no significant differences in the relative surface area of root canals and isthmus among the groups (p > 0.05). Samples in the SWEEPS group had significantly less RPT than UAI, NI, and C (p = 0.003, 0.014, 0.003, respectively). There were no significant differences between the UAI and NI (p = 0.583). SWEEPS was the most efficient in debridement of the root canal isthmus area. UAI and NI showed similar but lower efficiency.

Indexed as

Dental Pulp CavityRoot Canal TherapyGoldHumansLasersMolarUltrasonic WavesGoldDebridementHistologyIrrigationLaser-activated irrigationUltrasonic irrigation

Identifiers

PMID37599293
OpenAlexW4386012536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.