ArticleJournal of biomechanics2023
Inverse distance weighting to rapidly generate large simulation datasets.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transfer Learning With Simulated and Recorded Data Improves Predictions of Lateral Pinch Thumb-Tip Forces.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Microscale Mapping of Fiber Strain and Damage in Composite Wrinkled Laminates Using Computed Tomography Assisted Wide-Angle X-Ray Scattering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Obtaining large biomechanical datasets for machine learning is an ongoing challenge. Physics-based simulations offer one approach for generating large datasets, but many simulation methods, such as computed muscle control (CMC), are computationally costly. In contrast, interpolation methods, such as inverse distance weighting (IDW), are computationally fast. We examined whether IDW is a low-cost and accurate approach for interpolating muscle activations from CMC.IDW was evaluated using lateral pinch simulations in OpenSim. Simulated pinch data were organized into grids of varying sparsity (high, medium, and low density), where each grid point represented the muscle activations associated with a unique combination of mass and height of a young adult. For each grid, muscle activations were calculated via CMC and IDW for 108 random mass-height pairs that were not coincident with simulation grid vertices. We evaluated the interpolation errors from IDW for each grid, as well as the sensitivity of lateral pinch force to these errors. The root mean square error (RMSE) associated with interpolated muscle activations decreased with increasing grid density and never exceeded 4%. While CMC received a target thumb-tip force of 40 N, errors from the interpolated muscle activations never impacted the simulated force magnitude by more than 0.1 N. Furthermore, the computation time for CMC simulations averaged 4.22 core-minutes, while IDW averaged 0.95 core-seconds per mass-height pair.These results indicate IDW is a practical approach for rapidly estimating muscle activations from sparse CMC datasets. Future works could adapt our IDW approach to evaluate other tasks, biomechanical features, and/or populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.