ArticleScientific reports2023
Machine learning‑based prediction of survival prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning applications in the detection and treatment of esophageal cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Complex biological systems analysis and deep learning for prognostic prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.iScience · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Integrated single-cell and transcriptomic profiling identifies machine-learning-based pyroptosis biomarkers in IBD.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Building an interpretable machine learning prognosis prediction model-based on baseline examinations of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Investigating tryptophan metabolism in colorectal cancer using Single-cell RNA sequencing based on machine learning techniques.PloS one · 2026Article
- Interpretable survival modeling integrating nutritional-inflammatory biomarkers in elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive radiotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prognostic model for metastatic breast cancer and its interpretability: a multicenter retrospective study.Gland surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Early host-parasite interaction models reveal a key role for fibrinolysis in Fasciola hepatica intestinal migration.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Clinlabomics-Based Nomogram for Predicting the Prognosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer in China: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Observational
- Case Reports and Artificial Intelligence Challenges on Squamous Cell Carcinoma Developed on Chronic Radiodermitis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and their associations with hearing loss.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Esophageal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Downregulation of SMAD2 and SMAD4 is associated with poor prognosis and shorter survival in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Molecular biology reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning-driven prediction of medical expenses in triple-vessel PCI patients using feature selection.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of disease-free survival in breast cancer patients with non-pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- The role of vitamin D in sleep regulation: mechanisms, clinical advances, and future directions.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current prognostic tools for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) lack the necessary accuracy to facilitate individualized patient management strategies. To address this issue, this study was conducted to develop a machine learning (ML) prediction model for ESCC patients' survival management. Six ML approaches, including Rpart, Elastic Net, GBM, Random Forest, GLMboost, and the machine learning-extended CoxPH method, were employed to develop risk prediction models. The model was trained on a dataset of 1954 ESCC patients with 27 clinical features and validated on a dataset of 487 ESCC patients. The discriminative performance of the models was assessed using the concordance index (C-index). The best performing model was used for risk stratification and clinical evaluation. The study found that N stage, T stage, surgical margin, tumor grade, tumor length, sex, MPV, AST, FIB, and Mg are the important feature for ESCC patients' survival. The machine learning-extended CoxPH model, Elastic Net, and Random Forest had similar performance in predicting the mortality risk of ESCC patients, and outperformed GBM, GLMboost, and Rpart. The risk scores derived from the CoxPH model effectively stratified ESCC patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with distinctly different 3-year overall survival (OS) probabilities of 80.8%, 58.2%, and 29.5%, respectively. This risk stratification was also observed in the validation cohort. Furthermore, the risk model demonstrated greater discriminative ability and net benefit than the AJCC8th stage, suggesting its potential as a prognostic tool for predicting survival events and guiding clinical decision-making. The classical algorithm of the CoxPH method was also found to be sufficiently good for interpretive studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.