ArticleNPJ digital medicine2023
Predicting labor onset relative to the estimated date of delivery using smart ring physiological data.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefit of the N-of-1 Approach Versus Aggregate Analysis in Tracking Individual Trajectories During Pregnancy: Comparison of Longitudinal Wearable Observational Studies.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Smart Ring in Clinical Medicine: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Temporal Trajectories in Sleep, Temperature Trends, Cardiorespiratory, and Activity Metrics Measured via Oura Ring During Pregnancy: Large-Scale Observational Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Observational
- Adherence to digital pregnancy care - lessons learned from the SMART start feasibility study.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Investigating the role of maternal heart rate variability in the onset of labor.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Deep learning model using continuous skin temperature data predicts labor onset.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Trends in sensor-based health metrics during and after pregnancy: descriptive data from the apple women's health study.AJOG global reports · 2024Article
- Biometrics of complete human pregnancy recorded by wearable devices.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Editorial: New technologies improve maternal and newborn safety.Frontiers in medical technology · 2024Article
- Neural substrates underlying rhythmic coupling of female reproductive and thermoregulatory circuits.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transition from pregnancy into parturition is physiologically directed by maternal, fetal and placental tissues. We hypothesize that these processes may be reflected in maternal physiological metrics. We enrolled pregnant participants in the third-trimester (n = 118) to study continuously worn smart ring devices monitoring heart rate, heart rate variability, skin temperature, sleep and physical activity from negative temperature coefficient, 3-D accelerometer and infrared photoplethysmography sensors. Weekly surveys assessed labor symptoms, pain, fatigue and mood. We estimated the association between each metric, gestational age, and the likelihood of a participant's labor beginning prior to (versus after) the clinical estimated delivery date (EDD) of 40.0 weeks with mixed effects regression. A boosted random forest was trained on the physiological metrics to predict pregnancies that naturally passed the EDD versus undergoing onset of labor prior to the EDD. Here we report that many raw sleep, activity, pain, fatigue and labor symptom metrics are correlated with gestational age. As gestational age advances, pregnant individuals have lower resting heart rate 0.357 beats/minute/week, 0.84 higher heart rate variability (milliseconds) and shorter durations of physical activity and sleep. Further, random forest predictions determine pregnancies that would pass the EDD with accuracy of 0.71 (area under the receiver operating curve). Self-reported symptoms of labor correlate with increased gestational age and not with the timing of labor (relative to EDD) or onset of spontaneous labor. The use of maternal smart ring-derived physiological data in the third-trimester may improve prediction of the natural duration of pregnancy relative to the EDD.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.