ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2023
Towards Prediction of Blood Flow in Coiled Aneurysms Before Treatment: A Porous Media Approach.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modeling blood flow in aneurysms treated with coils could be used to understand the complete embolization of the aneurysm, through thrombus formation that fills the entire sac. Modeling of the endovascular coil mass as a porous medium is a technique that allows for study of aneurysm hemodynamics, efficiently for patient-specific treatment outcome predictions. Models in the literature use mean porosity of coils in the aneurysmal volume, proving inadequate for outcome prediction. However, models that consider heterogeneous porosity distribution have shown more accurate hemodynamics. We recently published the porous crown model, considering the heterogeneous coil mass distribution, validated on two patients. This study aims (i) to validate the porous crown model for a larger cohort (eight patients), and (ii) to propose a porous medium model translatable to clinical practice in treatment planning. We analyzed the porosity distribution of the endovascular coils deployed inside the cerebral aneurysm phantoms of eight patients using 3D x-ray synchrotron images. The permeability and inertial factor of the porous crown model are calculated using previously published methodology. We propose a new "bilinear" porous model, that uses the same hypothesis, but the permeability and inertial factor can be defined from just basic information available in the neuro-suite, i.e., the aneurysmal sac volume and the coil volume fraction targeted by the neurosurgeon. These two models are compared to the coil-resolved simulations, considered as the gold standard. The results show that both the porous crown model and the bilinear model produce similarly accurate hemodynamics in the aneurysm. The error in the standard (mean porosity) porous model is 66%, whereas the error of the bilinear model is 26%, compared to the coil-resolved. The bilinear model is promising as a means of treatment outcome prediction at time of intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.