Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37598013›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic and interventional imaging2024

Accurate non-invasive grading of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with a CT derived radiomics signature.

Ammar A Javed, Zhuotun Zhu, Benedict Kinny-Köster, Joseph R Habib, Satomi Kawamoto, Ralph H Hruban, Elliot K Fishman, Christopher L Wolfgang, Jin He, Linda C Chu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic and interventional imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Pancreatic Imaging: A Systematic Review.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ammar A JavedDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Department of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, New York City, New York 10016, USA.
Zhuotun ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Benedict Kinny-KösterDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, New York City, New York 10016, USA.
Joseph R HabibDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Satomi KawamotoDepartment of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Ralph H HrubanDepartment of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA; Sol Goldman Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Elliot K FishmanDepartment of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Christopher L WolfgangDepartment of Surgery, New York University Langone Hospital, New York City, New York 10016, USA.
Jin HeDepartment of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
Linda C ChuDepartment of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. Electronic address: lchu1@jhmi.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · USNew York University · US

Funding

Tumor Antigens for Individual Signatures and TherapyP50CA062924 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI JAFFEE, ELIZABETH M. · 1993 to 2022
$54.6M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA062924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to develop a radiomics-signature using computed tomography (CT) data for the preoperative prediction of grade of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PNETs). MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for NF-PNETs between 2010 and 2019. A total of 2436 radiomic features were extracted from arterial and venous phases of pancreas-protocol CT examinations. Radiomic features that were associated with final pathologic grade observed in the surgical specimens were subjected to joint mutual information maximization for hierarchical feature selection and the development of the radiomic-signature. Youden-index was used to identify optimal cutoff for determining tumor grade. A random forest prediction model was trained and validated internally. The performance of this tool in predicting tumor grade was compared to that of EUS-FNA sampling that was used as the standard of reference.

resultsA total of 270 patients were included and a fusion radiomic-signature based on 10 selected features was developed using the development cohort (n = 201). There were 149 men and 121 women with a mean age of 59.4 ± 12.3 (standard deviation) years (range: 23.3-85.0 years). Upon internal validation in a new set of 69 patients, a strong discrimination was observed with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71-0.90) with corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% (95% CI: 79.7-95.3) and 73.3% (95% CI: 62.9-83.8) respectively. Of the study population, 143 patients (52.9%) underwent EUS-FNA. Biopsies were non-diagnostic in 26 patients (18.2%) and could not be graded due to insufficient sample in 42 patients (29.4%). In the cohort of 75 patients (52.4%) in whom biopsies were graded the radiomic-signature demonstrated not different AUC as compared to EUS-FNA (AUC: 0.69 vs. 0.67; P = 0.723), however greater sensitivity (i.e., ability to accurately identify G2/3 lesion was observed (80.8% vs. 42.3%; P < 0.001).

conclusionNon-invasive assessment of tumor grade in patients with PNETs using the proposed radiomic-signature demonstrated high accuracy. Prospective validation and optimization could overcome the commonly experienced diagnostic uncertainty in the assessment of tumor grade in patients with PNETs and could facilitate clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Neuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligencePancreatic neoplasmsPancreatic neuroendocrine tumorsRadiomicsWHO grading

Identifiers

PMID37598013
PMCPMC10873069
OpenAlexW4385950063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.