ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2023
Optimal length of oral anticoagulant treatment for maximum benefit within 5 years after discontinuation of oral anticoagulants in patients with acute pulmonary embolism who require secondary thromboprophylaxis.
Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects on mortality of extended versus short-term anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- International Normalized Ratio Predicts Recurrence and Bleeding in Patients With Acute Venous Thromboembolism Who Undergo Direct Oral Anticoagulants.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtended oral anticoagulant (OA) use is recommended in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) who require secondary thromboprophylaxis. Nevertheless, the optimal length of OA use for the maximum long-term benefit in this patient population has been undefined to date.
methodsA retrospective study was performed to explore the role of different length of overall OA use (group 1 (≥1 year of OA use and <2 years of OA use), group 2 (≥2 years of OA use and <3 years of OA use), group 3 (≥ 3 years of OA use)) in outcomes within 5 years after OA discontinuation in patients with acute PE, who required secondary thromboprophylaxis. The primary outcome was mortality rates. The secondary outcomes comprised venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, major bleeding during OA use and net clinical benefit. Net clinical benefit was defined as the composite of recurrent VTE and major bleeding.
resultsFor a total of 385 patients in group 1 (n=220), group 2 (n=110) and group 3 (n=55), the PE-related mortality in group 1 was higher than that in group 2 (p=0.034) and 3 (p=0.040), respectively, whereas were similar between groups 2 and 3 (p=1.000). The net clinical benefit in group 1 was less than that in group 2 (p=0.024), whereas similar with that in group 3 (p=0.526). The net clinical benefit was comparable between groups 2 and 3 (p=0.716). The length of OA use was positively associated with major bleeding (HR, 2.510 (0.293 to 3.485), p=0.001), whereas negatively associated with PE-related mortality (HR, 0.668 (0.196 to 2.832), p=0.025) and VTE recurrence (HR, 0.694 (0.174 to 2.300), p=0.036), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of the length of OA use for the tendency of PE-related mortality was 70.2% and 46.2%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.654 (0.514 to 0.793) (p=0.029). The sensitivity and specificity of the length of OA use for the tendency of net clinical benefit was 86.8% and 64.3%, respectively. The AUC was 0.628 (0.565 to 0.690) (p<0.001)
conclusionsFor patients with acute PE who require secondary thromboprophylaxis, 2 to 3 years (30 months preferred) of overall OA use after a diagnosis of acute PE could be an optimal length to achieve maximum benefit within 5 years after OA discontinuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.