ArticleJournal of immunological methods2023
MILKSHAKE Western blot and Sundae ELISA: We all scream for better antibody validation.
Article in Journal of immunological methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sprinkling in extra validation for high-value PTMs and therapeutic Abs with MILKSHAKE Western blots and Sundae ELISAs.New biotechnology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the multivalent immune protective effects of theFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Engineered FHA domains can bind to a variety of Phosphothreonine-containing peptides.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2024Article
- Benchmarking antibody discovery fidelity and reproducibility with an assay-locked residue fidelity index.BioTechniquesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Knowing that an antibody's sensitivity and specificity is accurate is crucial for reliable data collection. This certainty is especially difficult to achieve for antibodies (Abs) which bind post-translationally modified proteins. Here we describe two validation methods using surrogate proteins in western blot and ELISA. The first method, which we termed "MILKSHAKE" is a modified maltose binding protein, hence the name, that is enzymatically conjugated to a peptide from the chosen target which is either modified or non-modified at the residue of interest. The surety of the residue's modification status can be used to confirm Ab specificity to the target's post-translational modification (PTM). The second method uses a set of surrogate proteins, which we termed "Sundae". Sundae consists of a set of modified maltose binding proteins with a genetically encoded target sequence, each of which contains a single amino acid substitution at one position of interest. With Sundae, Abs can be evaluated for binding specificities to all twenty amino acids at a single position. Combining MILKSHAKE and Sundae methods, Ab specificity can be determined at a single-residue resolution. These data improve evaluation of commercially available Abs and identify off-target effects for Research-Use-Only and therapeutic Abs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.