ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2023
Modeling X-chromosome inactivation and reactivation during human development.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical analysis of prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound findings, and follow-up in 92 Turner mosaic fetuses: a retrospective analysis of 12-year experience.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Single nuclei and spatial profiling of sacrococcygeal teratomas reveals cellular composition and X inactivation heterogeneity.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Exiting the ground state: the broad spectrum of cell fates accessible from naïve human pluripotent stem cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Epigenetic Mechanisms in Fabry Disease: A Thematic Analysis Linking Differential Methylation Profiles and Genetic Modifiers to Disease Phenotype.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Genetic analysis of an asymptomatic female with a large Xp deletion revealed insights into the X chromosome inactivation pattern: a case report.Molecular cytogenetics · 2025Article
- Biotin Induces Inactive Chromosome X Reactivation and Corrects Physiopathological Alterations in Beta-Propeller-Protein-Associated Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Modeling X chromosome inactivation using t5iLA naive human pluripotent stem cells.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Orchestrating Asymmetric Expression: Mechanisms behindEpigenomes · 2024Review
- An investigation of a hemophilia A female with heterozygous intron 22 inversion and skewed X chromosome inactivation.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stem-cell-based embryo models generate much excitement as they offer a window into an early phase of human development that has remained largely inaccessible to scientific investigation. An important epigenetic phenomenon during early embryogenesis is the epigenetic silencing of one of the two X chromosomes in female embryos, which ensures an equal output of X-linked gene expression between the sexes. X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is thought to be established within the first three weeks of human development, although the inactive X-chromosome is reactivated in primordial germ cells (PGCs) that migrate to the embryonic gonads. Here, we summarize our current understanding of X-chromosome dynamics during human development and comment on the potential of recently established stem-cell-based models to reveal the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.