Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37597201›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neurotrauma2023

Collaborative Care Versus Usual Care to Improve Quality of Life, Pain, Depression, and Physical Activity in Outpatients With Spinal Cord Injury: The SCI-CARE Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Charles H Bombardier, Jesse R Fann, Dawn M Ehde, Maria R Reyes, Stephen P Burns, Jason K Barber, Nancy R Temkin

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neurotrauma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charles H BombardierDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jesse R FannDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Dawn M EhdeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Maria R ReyesDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Stephen P BurnsDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Jason K BarberDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nancy R TemkinDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our goal was to test the effectiveness of collaborative care (CC) versus usual care (UC) to improve treatment of pain, depression, physical inactivity, and quality of life in outpatients with spinal cord injury (SCI). We conducted a single blind parallel group randomized controlled trial. The setting was two outpatient SCI rehabilitation clinics within a large academic medical center. Participants were 174 outpatients who were on average 47.7 years old, 76% male, 76% white, 8% Hispanic, 47% tetraplegic, 95% more than 1 year post-SCI, and 45% on Medicare. The intervention consisted of a mental health-trained collaborative care manager (CM) integrated into two SCI rehabilitation medicine clinics and supervised by content experts in pain and mental health treatment. The CM provided assessment, medical care coordination, adherence support, outcome monitoring, and decision support along with brief psychological interventions to the patients via up to 12 in-person or telephone sessions. Among all participants, 61% chose to focus on pain; 31% on physical activity and 8% on depression. The primary outcome was quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF at the end of treatment (4 months). Secondary outcomes were quality of life at 8 months and pain intensity and interference, depression severity, and minutes per week of moderate to vigorous physical activity at 4 and 8 months. A total of 174 participants were randomized 1:1 to CC (

Indexed as

Quality of LifeSpinal Cord InjuriesAgedDepressionExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedOutpatientsPainSingle-Blind MethodUnited Statescollaborative caredepressionpainphysical activityspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID37597201
PMCPMC11075937
OpenAlexW4386002173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.