Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37597161›Full record

Trial reportActa neurologica Belgica2024

Comparison of the effects of rhythmic vibrotactile stimulations and rhythmic auditory stimulations on Parkinson's disease patients' gait variability: a pilot study.

Alexis Lheureux, Thierry Lejeune, Ivan Doncev, Alix Jeanne, Gaëtan Stoquart

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05790759 (Effect of Rhythmic Haptic Stimulations on Long-Range Autocorrelations in Parkinson's Disease Gait Variability), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05790759 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Rhythmic Haptic Stimulations on Long-Range Autocorrelations in Parkinson's Disease Gait Variability : A Comparison With Auditory Stimulations

TypeinterventionalSponsorCliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de LouvainRan2020 to 2020Enrolled10ConditionsParkinson Disease, Gait, UnsteadyArmsNo cueing versus Haptic cueing versus Auditory cueing during parkinson's disease gait
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexis LheureuxCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium. alexis.lheureux@uclouvain.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2759-6871
Thierry LejeuneCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
Ivan DoncevUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Alix JeanneUniversité Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-La-Neuve, Belgium.
Gaëtan StoquartCliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParkinson's disease patients' gait is characterized by shorter step length, reduced gait velocity and deterioration of temporal organization of stride duration variability (modified Long Range Autocorrelations). The objective of this study was to compare effects of rhythmic auditory stimulations (RAS) and Rhythmic Vibrotactile Stimulations (RVS) on Parkinson's disease patients' gait.

methodsTen Parkinson's disease patients performed three walking conditions lasting 5-7 min each: control condition (CC), RAS condition and RVS condition. Inertial measurement units were used to assess spatiotemporal gait parameters. Stride duration variability was assessed in terms of magnitude using coefficient of variation and in terms of temporal organization (i.e., Long Range Autocorrelations computation) using the evenly spaced averaged Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (α-DFA exponent).

resultsGait velocity was significantly higher during RAS condition than during CC (Cohen's d = 0.52) and similar to RVS condition (Cohen's d = 0.17). Cadence was significantly higher during RAS (Cohen's d = 0.77) and RVS (Cohens' d = 0.56) conditions than during CC. Concerning variability, no difference was found either for mean coefficient of variation or mean α-DFA between conditions. However, a great variability of individual results between the RAS and the RVS conditions is to be noted concerning α-DFA.

conclusionsRAS and RVS improved similarly PD patients' spatiotemporal gait parameters, without modifying stride duration variability in terms of magnitude and temporal organization at group level. Future studies should evaluate the relevant parameters for administering the right cueing type for the right patient.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov registration number NCT05790759, date of registration: 16/03/2023, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseAcoustic StimulationGaitHumansPilot ProjectsWalkingGaitLong range autocorrelationsParkinson’s diseaseRhythmic auditory stimulationsRhythmic vibrotactile stimulations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.