ArticleJournal of fluorescence2024
Optimizing Excitation Light for Accurate Rapid Bacterial Species Identification with Autofluorescence.
Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nanoagent-Mediated Photothermal Therapy: From Delivery System Design to Synergistic Theranostic Applications.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid identification of bacterial species in patient samples is essential for the treatment of infectious diseases and the economics of health care. In this study, we investigated an algorithm to improve the accuracy of bacterial species identification with fluorescence spectroscopy based on autofluorescence from bacteria, and excitation wavelengths suitable for identification. The diagnostic accuracy of each algorithm for ten bacterial species was verified in a machine learning classifier algorithm. The three machine learning algorithms with the highest diagnostic accuracy, extra tree (ET), logistic regression (LR), and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were used to determine the number and wavelength of excitation wavelengths suitable for the diagnosis of bacterial species. The key excitation wavelengths for the diagnosis of bacterial species were 280 nm, 300 nm, 380 nm, and 480 nm, with 280 nm being the most important. The median diagnostic accuracy was equivalent to that of 200 excitation wavelengths when two excitation wavelengths were used for ET and LR, and three excitation wavelengths for MLP. These results demonstrate that there is an optimum wavelength range of excitation wavelengths required for spectroscopic measurement of bacterial autofluorescence for bacterial species identification, and that measurement of only a few wavelengths in this range is sufficient to achieve sufficient accuracy for diagnosis of bacterial species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.