Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37597134›Full record

ArticleJournal of fluorescence2024

Optimizing Excitation Light for Accurate Rapid Bacterial Species Identification with Autofluorescence.

Daisuke Mito, Hideo Eda, Shin-Ichiro Okihara, Masakazu Kurita, Nami Hatayama, Yusuke Yoshino, Yoshinobu Watanabe, Katsuhiro Ishii

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fluorescence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daisuke MitoThe Graduate School for the Creation of New Photonics Industries, Shizuoka, 431-1202, Japan. 063m2089@gpi.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4544-0264
Hideo EdaThe Graduate School for the Creation of New Photonics Industries, Shizuoka, 431-1202, Japan.
Shin-Ichiro OkiharaThe Graduate School for the Creation of New Photonics Industries, Shizuoka, 431-1202, Japan.
Masakazu KuritaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Nami HatayamaSchool of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke YoshinoSchool of Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshinobu WatanabeTrauma and Reconstruction Center, Teikyo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Katsuhiro IshiiThe Graduate School for the Creation of New Photonics Industries, Shizuoka, 431-1202, Japan.
Graduate School for the Creation of New Photonics Industries · JPTeikyo University · JPTeikyo University Hospital · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JP

Funding

the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI) JP19K18925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of bacterial species in patient samples is essential for the treatment of infectious diseases and the economics of health care. In this study, we investigated an algorithm to improve the accuracy of bacterial species identification with fluorescence spectroscopy based on autofluorescence from bacteria, and excitation wavelengths suitable for identification. The diagnostic accuracy of each algorithm for ten bacterial species was verified in a machine learning classifier algorithm. The three machine learning algorithms with the highest diagnostic accuracy, extra tree (ET), logistic regression (LR), and multilayer perceptron (MLP), were used to determine the number and wavelength of excitation wavelengths suitable for the diagnosis of bacterial species. The key excitation wavelengths for the diagnosis of bacterial species were 280 nm, 300 nm, 380 nm, and 480 nm, with 280 nm being the most important. The median diagnostic accuracy was equivalent to that of 200 excitation wavelengths when two excitation wavelengths were used for ET and LR, and three excitation wavelengths for MLP. These results demonstrate that there is an optimum wavelength range of excitation wavelengths required for spectroscopic measurement of bacterial autofluorescence for bacterial species identification, and that measurement of only a few wavelengths in this range is sufficient to achieve sufficient accuracy for diagnosis of bacterial species.

Indexed as

BacteriaSpectrometry, FluorescenceAlgorithmsFluorescenceHumansLightMachine LearningOptical ImagingBacterial speciesDiagnosticsExcitation wavelengthsFluorescence spectroscopyIdentification

Identifiers

PMID37597134
OpenAlexW4386000558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.