ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024
Effect of teleconsultation on the application of thrombolytic therapy in stroke patients in the emergency department.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecently, telemedicine has become a widely used method worldwide for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke in hospitals where neurologists are unavailable. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and reliability of treatment decisions made by remote neurologists via teleconference assisted by emergency physicians in acute stroke cases and to determine whether the use of teleconsultation would lead to any delays in assessment and treatment decisions.
methodsThis single-center and prospective study was performed with 104 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Patients were concurrently assessed by a teleneurologist (TN) experienced in stroke and an on-site neurologist (OS-N). The TN performed their assessment via teleconference and assisted by an emergency physician for test results and physical examination. NIHSS (The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) scores, assessment times, treatment decisions by the two neurologists, and patient outcomes were recorded separately. The TN was asked to rate the quality of communication.
resultsOf the 104 patients in the study, 59.6% (n = 62) were men and the median age was 66 (interquartile range = 56-78) years. The median duration of assessment by the OS-N was 30 (18-45) min and the median duration of assessment by the TN was 6 (5-8) min; the duration of assessment by the TN was significantly shorter (6.56 min vs. 33.35 min; Z = 8.669; p < 0.001). The median rating assigned by the TN to the quality of teleconsultation was 5.0 (4.25-5.0) (Table 1). The NIHSS scores assigned by both neurologists showed significant correlation (p < 0.001). Analysis of the agreement between the OS-N and TN in their treatment decisions yielded a Kappa value of 74.3% for interrater agreement.
conclusionsTeleconsultation was a successful and reliable strategy in assessing patients with ischemic stroke and making decisions for IV-tPA. Moreover, patient assessment via teleconsultation was less time consuming. The results of the study are promising for the use of teleconsultation in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.