ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023
Intravenous injection of tumor extracellular vesicles suppresses tumor growth by reducing the regulatory T cell phenotype.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Extracellular Vesicles for Therapeutic Applications: A Translational Framework Integrating Sources, Administration Routes, Indications, Quality Control, and Regulatory Systems.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Platelet-derived microparticles increase the interaction of colorectal cancer cells with the endothelium to promote metastatic events.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Crosstalk Between Extracellular Vesicles and Regulatory T Cells Across Cancers: From Interaction to Therapeutic Potential.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles in hepatocellular carcinoma: unraveling immunological mechanisms for enhanced diagnosis and overcoming drug resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundColorectal cancer is a disease of unmet medical need. Although extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been implicated in anti-tumor responses, discrepancies were observed among studies. We analyzed the role of tumor-derived EVs (TEVs) in tumor progression in vivo by focusing on regulatory T (Treg) cells, which play essential roles in tumor development and progression.
methodsA mouse model of colorectal cancer lung metastasis was generated using BALB/c mice by tail vein injection of the BALB/c colon adenocarcinoma cell line Colon-26. TEVs derived from Colon-26 and BALB/c lung squamous cell carcinoma ASB-XIV were retrieved from the culture media supernatants. A TEV equivalent to 10 µg protein was injected every other day for 2 weeks.
resultsHistology and immunohistochemistry studies revealed that lung tumors reduced in the Colon-26-EV group when compared to the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) group. The population of CD4 + FoxP3 + cells in the lung was upregulated in the PBS group mice when compared to the healthy mice (P < 0.001), but was significantly downregulated in the Colon-26-EV group mice when compared to the PBS group mice (P < 0.01). Programmed cell death protein 1, glucocorticoid-induced TNFR-related protein, and CD69 expression in lung Treg cells were markedly upregulated in the PBS group when compared to the healthy mice, but downregulated in the Colon-26-EV group when compared to the PBS group. The changes in expression were dose-dependent for Colon-26-EVs. ASB-EVs also led to significantly downregulated Treg cell expression, although non-cancer line 3T3-derived EVs did not.
conclusionOur study suggests that TEVs possess components for tumor suppression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.