Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596779›Full record

ReviewExpert review of clinical immunology

JAK inhibitors and black box warnings: what is the future for JAK inhibitors?

Kate Tokareva, Pankti Reid, Victor Yang, David Liew, Alexander C Peterson, Aaron Baraff, Jon Giles, Namrata Singh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of clinical immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Advances in targeted therapies for chronic spontaneous urticaria].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Selecting first-line advanced therapy for ulcerative colitis: A clinical application of personalized medicine.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate TokarevaMedical Student, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Pankti ReidDivision of Rheumatology and Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7645-0919
Victor YangDepartment of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0013-9865
David LiewDepartment of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8451-8883
Alexander C PetersonSeattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center (ERIC), VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aaron BaraffSeattle Epidemiologic Research and Information Center (ERIC), VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jon GilesColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Namrata SinghDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7149-363X
Austin Health · AUUniversity of Puget Sound · USColumbia University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Washington · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Improving shared decision-making around the use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cancerK23AR079588 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Namrata Singh · 2022 to 2026
$821k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR079588
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionJanus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have dramatically improved the treatment of various autoimmune and myeloproliferative disorders. Recently, concern has arisen regarding their safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. AREAS COVERED: Here, we provide a comprehensive summary of the major current and emerging JAKi and their indications, address recent studies on comparative safety, and provide insight into their future and use. We emphasize that the application of the research findings on a case-by-case basis should consider a patient's age, comorbidities, disease for which JAKi is being considered, disease activity, the JAKi target(s), alternate treatment options available for the patient, and the planned duration of JAKi. EXPERT OPINION: Rheumatologists are used to prescribing therapies in which a risk-to-benefit assessment is required as well as to screening and monitoring the safety of medications. Thus, rheumatologists are already practiced in applying specific criteria to effectively screen and monitor patients who are candidates for JAKi therapy. Ongoing research will help to clarify any mechanisms underlying differential safety signals between JAK and other therapies, what the balance between risk and efficacy is, who the susceptible subpopulations are, and whether safety signals are shared between different JAKis and across indications.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidJanus Kinase InhibitorsDrug LabelingHumansAntirheumatic AgentsJanus Kinase InhibitorsCancercomparative safetyJAK inhibitorsMACErheumatoid arthritisshared decision makingTnfi

Identifiers

PMID37596779
PMCPMC10615860
OpenAlexW4385997353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.