Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596698›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2023

Performance of urinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 for the prediction of persistent acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yih-Ting Chen, Heng-Chih Pan, Cheng-Kai Hsu, Chiao-Yin Sun, Chun-Yu Chen, Yi-Hung Chen, Heng-Jung Hsu, I-Wen Wu, Vin-Cent Wu, Eric Hoste

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury.Annals of intensive care · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yih-Ting ChenChang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Heng-Chih PanChang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan. hengchihpan0107@gmail.com.
Cheng-Kai HsuChang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chiao-Yin SunChang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chun-Yu ChenChang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yi-Hung ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Heng-Jung HsuChang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
I-Wen WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Vin-Cent WuDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Eric HosteIntensive Care Unit, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Eric.Hoste@UGent.be.
Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TWResearch Foundation - Flanders · BETaipei Medical University · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 106-2321-B-182-002, MOST 107-2321-B-182-004, MOST 108-2321-B-182-003, MOST 109-2321-B-182-001National Health Research Institutes PH-102-SP-09National Science Council 104-2314-B-002-125-MY3, 106-2314-B-002 -166 -MY3,107-2314-B-002-026-MY3National Taiwan University Hospital 106-FTN20, 106-P02, UN106-014, 106-S3582, 107-S3809, 107-T02,PC1246, VN109-09,109-S4634,UN109-041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14) has been described as an effective marker for delayed recovery of acute kidney injury (AKI), yet its efficacy has been found to vary between different trials. The goal of this research was to assess the predictive performance of urinary CCL14 as a marker for persistent AKI.

methodsIn accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2023 for studies of adults (> 18 years) that reported the diagnostic performance of urinary CCL14. The sensitivity, specificity, number of events, true positive, and false positive results were extracted and evaluated. Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves (HSROCs) were used to summarize the pooled test performance, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria were used to appraise the quality of evidence.

resultsWe included six studies with 952 patients in this meta-analysis. The occurrence of persistent AKI among these patients was 39.6% (377/952). The pooled sensitivity and specificity results of urinary CCL14 in predicting persistent AKI were 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.87) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.53-0.84), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio (LR) was 2.75 (95% CI 1.63-4.66), and the negative LR was 0.27 (95% CI 0.18-0.41). The HSROC with pooled diagnostic accuracy was 0.84.

conclusionOur results suggest that urinary CCL14 can be used as an effective marker for predicting persistent AKI.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAdultChemokinesChemokines, CCDatabases, FactualHumansLigandsROC CurveCCL14 protein, humanChemokinesChemokines, CCLigands

Identifiers

PMID37596698
PMCPMC10439656
OpenAlexW4385987224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.