Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596695›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2023

A predictive model for the risk of sepsis within 30 days of admission in patients with traumatic brain injury in the intensive care unit: a retrospective analysis based on MIMIC-IV database.

Fangqi Hu, Jiaqiu Zhu, Sheng Zhang, Cheng Wang, Liangjia Zhang, Hui Zhou, Hui Shi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fangqi Hu *Department of Neurosurgery, Lianyungang Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Jiaqiu Zhu *Department of Neurosurgery, The Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang City, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Sheng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, 313000, Zhejiang, China.
Cheng WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lianyungang Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Liangjia ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lianyungang Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Hui ZhouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lianyungang Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China. 1138514130@qq.com.
Hui ShiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Lianyungang Clinical Medical College, Nanjing Medical University, Lianyungang, 222000, Jiangsu, China.
Nanjing Medical University · CNLianyungang Oriental Hospital · CNHuzhou Central Hospital · CNThe First People’s Hospital of Lianyungang · CN

Funding

The sixth 521 high-level talent training project in Lianyungang City NO. LYG06521202104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTraumatic brain injury (TBI) patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are at a high risk of infection and sepsis. However, there are few studies on predicting secondary sepsis in TBI patients in the ICU. This study aimed to build a prediction model for the risk of secondary sepsis in TBI patients in the ICU, and provide effective information for clinical diagnosis and treatment.

methodsUsing the MIMIC IV database version 2.0 (Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV), we searched data on TBI patients admitted to ICU and considered them as a study cohort. The extracted data included patient demographic information, laboratory indicators, complications, and other clinical data. The study cohort was divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort. In the training cohort, variables were screened by LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression and stepwise Logistic regression to assess the predictive ability of each feature on the incidence of patients. The screened variables were included in the final Logistic regression model. Finally, the decision curve, calibration curve, and receiver operating character (ROC) were used to test the performance of the model.

resultsFinally, a total of 1167 patients were included in the study, and these patients were randomly divided into the training (N = 817) and validation (N = 350) cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. In the training cohort, seven features were identified as key predictors of secondary sepsis in TBI patients in the ICU, including acute kidney injury (AKI), anemia, invasive ventilation, GCS (Glasgow Coma Scale) score, lactic acid, and blood calcium level, which were included in the final model. The areas under the ROC curve in the training cohort and the validation cohort were 0.756 and 0.711, respectively. The calibration curve and ROC curve show that the model has favorable predictive accuracy, while the decision curve shows that the model has favorable clinical benefits with good and robust predictive efficiency.

conclusionWe have developed a nomogram model for predicting secondary sepsis in TBI patients admitted to the ICU, which can provide useful predictive information for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticSepsisHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesIntensive care unitMICMIC databaseNomogramSepsisTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID37596695
PMCPMC10436454
OpenAlexW4385986088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.