Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596658›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2023

Ideal marker for targeted axillary dissection (IMTAD): a prospective multicentre trial.

Jan Žatecký, Oldřich Coufal, Ondřej Zapletal, Otakar Kubala, Markéta Kepičová, Adéla Faridová, Karel Rauš, Jiří Gatěk, Peter Kosáč, Matúš Peteja

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04580251 (Ideal Marker for Targeted Axillary Dissection), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04580251 completednot on this map

Ideal Marker for Targeted Axillary Dissection

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled100ConditionsBreast CancerArmsTargeted axillary dissection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jan ŽateckýDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic. janzatecky.jz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-0853
Oldřich CoufalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ondřej ZapletalDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
Otakar KubalaDepartment of Surgical Studies, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Markéta KepičováDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Adéla FaridováOncogynecology Centre, The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karel RaušOncogynecology Centre, The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří GatěkDepartment of Surgery, EUC Clinic Zlín, Zlín, Czech Republic.
Peter KosáčDepartment of Surgery, EUC Clinic Zlín, Zlín, Czech Republic.
Matúš PetejaDepartment of Surgery, Silesian Hospital in Opava, Opava, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZSilesian University in Opava · CZÚstav pro Péči o Matku a Dítě · CZTomas Bata University in Zlín · CZUniversity Hospital Ostrava · CZUniversity of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTargeted axillary dissection (TAD) is an established method for axillary staging in patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). TAD consists of sentinel lymph node biopsy and initially pathological lymph node excision, which must be marked by a reliable marker before NAC.

methodsThe IMTAD study is a prospective multicentre trial comparing three localisation markers for lymph node localisation (clip + iodine seed, magnetic seed, carbon suspension) facilitating subsequent surgical excision in the form of TAD. The primary outcome was to prospectively compare the reliability, accuracy, and safety according to complication rate during marker implantation and detection and marker dislodgement.

resultsOne hundred eighty-nine patients were included in the study-in 135 patients clip + iodine seed was used, in 30 patients magnetic seed and in 24 patients carbon suspension. The complication rate during the marker implantation and detection were not statistically significant between individual markers (p = 0.263; p = 0.117). Marker dislodgement was reported in 4 patients with clip + iodine seed localisation (3.0%), dislodgement did not occur in other localisation methods (p = 0.999). The false-negativity of sentinel lymph node (SLN) was observed in 8 patients, the false-negativity of targeted lymph nodes (TLN) wasn´t observed at all, the false-negativity rate (FNR) from the subcohort of ypN + patients for SLN is 9.6% and for TLN 0.0%.

conclusionThe IMTAD study indicated, that clip + iodine seed, magnetic seed and carbon suspension are statistically comparable in terms of complications during marker implantation and detection and marker dislodgement proving their safety, accuracy, and reliability in TAD. The study confirmed, that the FNR of the TLN was lower than the FNR of the SLN proving that the TLN is a better marker for axillary lymph node status after NAC.

trial registrationNCT04580251. Name of registry: Clinicaltrials.gov. Date of registration: 8.10.2020.

Indexed as

IodineLymphadenopathyCarbonHumansIodine RadioisotopesLymph Node ExcisionProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyCarbonIodineIodine-135Iodine RadioisotopesBreast cancerCarbon suspensionClipIodine seedMagnetic seedTargeted axillary dissection

Identifiers

PMID37596658
PMCPMC10439625
OpenAlexW4385972605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.