ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2023
Evaluation of Internet-based pharmaceutical care effect on young and middle-aged patients with hypertension by the principal component analysis and the Markov cohort during COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPharmaceutical care has the potential to improve hypertension control rates in young and middle-aged patients. Due the COVID-19 epidemic, standard intervention methods may not be applicable. We propose establishing an internet-based pharmaceutical care (IPC) route to improve blood pressure control in young and middle-aged patients with hypertension. An evaluation method based on Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Orthogonal Partial Least-Discriminant Analysis (OPLS-DA) was established to evaluate the effect of the IPC method.
methods1) Internet-based Pharmaceutical care (IPC) was provided by pharmacists mainly using Wechat software for one year after enrollment; 2) PCA and OPLS-DA were applied to analyze questionnaire reliability and data variability; 3) Markov cohort was used to evaluate the IPC effect.
resultsNinety-seven young and middle-aged patients were enrolled. 96 patients received the IPC. 1) The blood pressure control rate increased to 71.88% after IPC in 96 patients. 2) After conducting PCA and OPLS-DA analysis, 10 questions in the questionnaire were significantly improved after the IPC. 3) Markov cohort results showed that patient survival after 28 cycles was 18.62 years and the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was extended by 5.40 years. The cumulative cost-effectiveness ratio was ¥87.10 per QALY.
conclusionsThe IPC method could significantly improve the blood pressure control rate of patients. The questionnaire analysis method based on PCA and OPLS-DA is an effective method to evaluate the effect of the IPC method. The Markov cohort showed that the IPC had an effect on blood pressure control rate changes. Patients had a strong willingness to pay for IPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.