Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596458›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2024

Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the classification of spinal cord tumor.

Sheetal Garg, Bhagyashree Raghavan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sheetal GargDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, ATME College of Engineering, Mysuru, India. sugarg02@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8386-6325
Bhagyashree RaghavanDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, ATME College of Engineering, Mysuru, India.
Universal Engineering College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord Tumor has been characterized as a heterogeneous disease consisting of many different subtypes. The early diagnosis and prognosis of a cancer type have become a necessity in cancer research, as it can facilitate the subsequent clinical management of patients. The importance of classifying cancer patients into Bening or malignant has led many re- search teams, from the biomedical and the bioinformatics field, to study the application of machine learning (ML) methods. Therefore, these techniques have been utilized as an aim to model the progression and treatment of cancerous conditions. In addition, the ability of ML tools to detect key features from complex datasets reveals their importance. A variety of these techniques, Logistic regression, Support Vector Machines (SVMs), Decision Trees (DTs), Random forest classifier(RFs) have been widely applied in cancer research for the development of predictive models, resulting in effective and accurate decision making. Even though it is evident that the use of ML methods can improve our understanding of cancer progression, an appropriate level of validation is needed in order for these methods to be considered in the everyday clinical practice. In this work, we have discussed a predictive model based on various supervised ML techniques.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSpinal Cord NeoplasmsHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningSupport Vector MachineKNNLogistic regressionMachine learning algorithmsMRIRandom forestSpinal cord tumorSupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID37596458
OpenAlexW4385972603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.