Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596407›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Radiation exposure and leukaemia risk among cohorts of persons exposed to low and moderate doses of external ionising radiation in childhood.

Mark P Little, Richard Wakeford, Lydia B Zablotska, David Borrego, Keith T Griffin, Rodrigue S Allodji, Florent de Vathaire, Choonsik Lee, Alina V Brenner, Jeremy S Miller and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark P Little *Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA. mark.little@nih.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-0980-7567
Richard Wakeford *Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Ellen Wilkinson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2934-0987
Lydia B Zablotska *Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 550 16th Street, 2nd floor, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
David BorregoRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Keith T GriffinRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Rodrigue S AllodjiEquipe d'Epidémiologie des radiations, Unité 1018 INSERM, Bâtiment B2M, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Cedex, 94805, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1895-8415
Florent de VathaireEquipe d'Epidémiologie des radiations, Unité 1018 INSERM, Bâtiment B2M, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, Cedex, 94805, France.
Choonsik LeeRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Alina V BrennerRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Jeremy S MillerInformation Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, 20904, USA.
David CampbellInformation Management Services, Silver Spring, MD, 20904, USA.
Mark S PearceInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Siegal SadetzkiIsrael Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
Michele M DoodyRadiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Erik HolmbergDepartment of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413-45, Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-4550
Marie LundellDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, S-17176, Stockholm, Sweden.
Benjamin FrenchDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Michael Jacob Adams *University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, 265 Crittenden Boulevard, CU 420644, Rochester, NY, 14642-0644, USA.
Amy Berrington de González *Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Martha S Linet *Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
National Cancer Institute · USInformation Management Services · USInserm · FRInstitute of Cancer Research · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SERoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSahlgrenska University Hospital · SESheba Medical Center · ILUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Rochester · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Canadian Fluoroscopy Cohort Study: Lifespan Mortality and Incidence Follow-UpR01CA197422 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ZABLOTSKA, LYDIA B · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany high-dose groups demonstrate increased leukaemia risks, with risk greatest following childhood exposure; risks at low/moderate doses are less clear.

methodsWe conducted a pooled analysis of the major radiation-associated leukaemias (acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) with/without the inclusion of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL)) in ten childhood-exposed groups, including Japanese atomic bomb survivors, four therapeutically irradiated and five diagnostically exposed cohorts, a mixture of incidence and mortality data. Relative/absolute risk Poisson regression models were fitted.

resultsOf 365 cases/deaths of leukaemias excluding chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, there were 272 AML/CML/ALL among 310,905 persons (7,641,362 person-years), with mean active bone marrow (ABM) dose of 0.11 Gy (range 0-5.95). We estimated significant (P < 0.005) linear excess relative risks/Gy (ERR/Gy) for: AML (n = 140) = 1.48 (95% CI 0.59-2.85), CML (n = 61) = 1.77 (95% CI 0.38-4.50), and ALL (n = 71) = 6.65 (95% CI 2.79-14.83). There is upward curvature in the dose response for ALL and AML over the full dose range, although at lower doses (<0.5 Gy) curvature for ALL is downwards. DISCUSSION: We found increased ERR/Gy for all major types of radiation-associated leukaemia after childhood exposure to ABM doses that were predominantly (for 99%) <1 Gy, and consistent with our prior analysis focusing on <100 mGy.

Indexed as

LeukemiaLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedRadiation ExposureHumansIncidenceRadiation DosageRadiation, IonizingRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37596407
PMCPMC10539334
OpenAlexW4385987204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.