ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Applying deep learning to recognize the properties of vitreous opacity in ophthalmic ultrasound images.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An ultrasound foundation model for the stratification of vision impairment and eye cancer risk.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Enhanced gallbladder cancer detection via active and self-supervised learning integration: Innovating B-ultrasound image analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Performance of automated machine learning in detecting fundus diseases based on ophthalmologic B-scan ultrasound images.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Ocular Disease Detection with Deep Learning (Fine-Grained Image Categorization) Applied to Ocular B-Scan Ultrasound Images.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo explore the feasibility of artificial intelligence technology based on deep learning to automatically recognize the properties of vitreous opacities in ophthalmic ultrasound images.
methodsA total of 2000 greyscale Doppler ultrasound images containing non-pathological eye and three typical vitreous opacities confirmed as physiological vitreous opacity (VO), asteroid hyalosis (AH), and vitreous haemorrhage (VH) were selected and labelled for each lesion type. Five residual networks (ResNet) and two GoogLeNet models were trained to recognize vitreous lesions. Seventy-five percent of the images were randomly selected as the training set, and the remaining 25% were selected as the test set. The accuracy and parameters were recorded and compared among these seven different deep learning (DL) models. The precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for recognizing vitreous lesions were calculated for the most accurate DL model.
resultsThese seven DL models had significant differences in terms of their accuracy and parameters. GoogLeNet Inception V1 achieved the highest accuracy (95.5%) and minor parameters (10315580) in vitreous lesion recognition. GoogLeNet Inception V1 achieved precision values of 0.94, 0.94, 0.96, and 0.96, recall values of 0.94, 0.93, 0.97 and 0.98, and F1 scores of 0.94, 0.93, 0.96 and 0.97 for normal, VO, AH, and VH recognition, respectively. The AUC values for these four vitreous lesion types were 0.99, 1.0, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively.
conclusionsGoogLeNet Inception V1 has shown promising results in ophthalmic ultrasound image recognition. With increasing ultrasound image data, a wide variety of confidential information on eye diseases can be detected automatically by artificial intelligence technology based on deep learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.