Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596382›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Computational modeling allows unsupervised classification of epileptic brain states across species.

Isa Dallmer-Zerbe, Nikola Jajcay, Jan Chvojka, Radek Janca, Petr Jezdik, Pavel Krsek, Petr Marusic, Premysl Jiruska, Jaroslav Hlinka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Isa Dallmer-ZerbeDepartment of Complex Systems, Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Nikola JajcayDepartment of Complex Systems, Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jan ChvojkaDepartment of Physiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Radek JancaDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 166 27, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr JezdikDepartment of Circuit Theory, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 166 27, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel KrsekDepartment of Paediatric Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Petr MarusicDepartment of Neurology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Motol University Hospital, Charles University, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Premysl JiruskaDepartment of Physiology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 150 06, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jaroslav HlinkaDepartment of Complex Systems, Institute of Computer Science, Czech Academy of Sciences, 182 00, Prague, Czech Republic. hlinka@cs.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1402-1470
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZCzech Technical University in Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current advances in epilepsy treatment aim to personalize and responsively adjust treatment parameters to overcome patient heterogeneity in treatment efficiency. For tailoring treatment to the individual and the current brain state, tools are required that help to identify the patient- and time-point-specific parameters of epilepsy. Computational modeling has long proven its utility in gaining mechanistic insight. Recently, the technique has been introduced as a diagnostic tool to predict individual treatment outcomes. In this article, the Wendling model, an established computational model of epilepsy dynamics, is used to automatically classify epileptic brain states in intracranial EEG from patients (n = 4) and local field potential recordings from in vitro rat data (high-potassium model of epilepsy, n = 3). Five-second signal segments are classified to four types of brain state in epilepsy (interictal, preonset, onset, ictal) by comparing a vector of signal features for each data segment to four prototypical feature vectors obtained by Wendling model simulations. The classification result is validated against expert visual assessment. Model-driven brain state classification achieved a classification performance significantly above chance level (mean sensitivity 0.99 on model data, 0.77 on rat data, 0.56 on human data in a four-way classification task). Model-driven prototypes showed similarity with data-driven prototypes, which we obtained from real data for rats and humans. Our results indicate similar electrophysiological patterns of epileptic states in the human brain and the animal model that are well-reproduced by the computational model, and captured by a key set of signal features, enabling fully automated and unsupervised brain state classification in epilepsy.

Indexed as

BrainEpilepsyAnimalsCardiac ElectrophysiologyComputer SimulationElectrocorticographyHumansRats

Identifiers

PMID37596382
PMCPMC10439162
OpenAlexW4385981077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.