Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596340›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Comparative study of microscale and macroscale technique for encapsulation of Calotropis gigantea extract in metal-conjugated nanomatrices for invasive ductal carcinoma.

Ayesha Aftab, Bashir Ahmad, Shazia Bashir, Saima Rafique, Muhammad Bashir, Tayyaba Ghani, Asma Gul, Atta Ullah Shah, Ranjha Khan, Abdulrahim A Sajini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ayesha AftabDepartment of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, H10 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Bashir AhmadDepartment of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, H10 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan. bashir.ahmad@iiu.edu.pk.
Shazia BashirDepartment of Physics and Applied Mathematics, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan. shazia@pieas.edu.pk.
Saima RafiqueDepartment of Physics, Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad BashirDepartment of Physics and Applied Mathematics, Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Tayyaba GhaniDepartment of Metallurgy and Material Engineering, PIEAS, Islamabad, 45650, Pakistan.
Asma GulDepartment of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, H10 Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Atta Ullah ShahNational Institute of Laser and Optronics (NILOP), Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Ranjha KhanUCSF/Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abdulrahim A SajiniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, 127788, United Arab Emirates.
International Islamic University, Islamabad · PKPakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences · PKAir University · PKKhalifa University of Science and Technology · AEPakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology · PKUCSF Benioff Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The encapsulation of plant extract in nanomatrices has limitations due to its adhesion to walls, size control, high cost and long durations that results in low yield. Macroscale and microscale level techniques for development of micro/nanoparticles may impact the encapsulation of plant extract. This study aimed to evaluate the relative efficiency of microscale and macroscale techniques for encapsulation of plant extract, which is not compared yet. Keeping this in view, encapsulation of Calotropis gigantea leaves extract (CaG) was attained in silver-conjugated poliglusam nanomatrices (POL/Ag) to induce apoptosis in invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) cells. The ethanolic CaG extract was prepared using percolation method and characterized by chemical tests for its active phytochemical compounds. The droplet-based microfluidic system was utilized as microscale encapsulation technique for CaG in nanomatrices at two different aqueous to oil flow rate ratios 1.0:1.5, and 1.0:3.0. Moreover, conventional batch system was utilized as macroscale encapsulation technique consisted of hot plate magnetic stirrer. The prepared nanomatrices were analysed for antioxidant activity using DPPH test and for cytotoxicity analysis using MCF-7 cells. The characteristic peaks of UV-Vis, FTIR and XRD spectrum confirmed the synthesis of CaG(POL/Ag) by both the encapsulation methods. However, microfluidic system was found to be more expedient because of attaining small and uniform sized silver nanoparticles (92 ± 19 nm) at high flow rate and achieving high encapsulation efficiency (80.25%) as compared to the conventional batch method (52.5%). CaG(POL/Ag) nanomatrices found to have significant antioxidant activity (p = 0.0014) against DPPH radical scavenging activity. The CaG(POL/Ag) of the smallest sized formulated by the microfluidic system has also shown the highest cytotoxicity (90%) as compared to batch method (70%) at 80 µg/mL. Our results indicate that the microscale technique using microfluidic system is a more efficient method to formulate size-controlled CaG(POL/Ag) nanomatrices and achieve high encapsulation of plant extract. Additionally, CaG(Pol/Ag) was found to be an efficient new combination for inducing potent (p < 0.0001) apoptosis in IDC cells. Therefore, CaG(Pol/Ag) can be further tested as an anti-cancer agent for in-vivo experiments.

Indexed as

CalotropisCarcinoma, DuctalMetal NanoparticlesAntioxidantsPlant ExtractsSilverAntioxidantsPlant ExtractsSilver

Identifiers

PMID37596340
PMCPMC10439222
OpenAlexW4385987330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.