ArticleScientific reports2023
Generative adversarial networks based skin lesion segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Skin Lesion and Cancer Detection Using Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synthetic Melanoma Image Generation and Evaluation Using Generative Adversarial Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Foundation-Model-Driven Skin Lesion Segmentation and Classification Using SAM-Adapters and Vision Transformers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- AttenUNeT X with iterative feedback mechanisms for robust deep learning skin lesion segmentation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Generative Adversarial Networks in Dermatology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Semi-supervised GAN with hybrid regularization and evolutionary hyperparameter tuning for accurate melanoma detection.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MSA-Net: a multi-scale and adversarial learning network for segmenting bone metastases in low-resolution SPECT imaging.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer is a serious condition that requires accurate diagnosis and treatment. One way to assist clinicians in this task is using computer-aided diagnosis tools that automatically segment skin lesions from dermoscopic images. We propose a novel adversarial learning-based framework called Efficient-GAN (EGAN) that uses an unsupervised generative network to generate accurate lesion masks. It consists of a generator module with a top-down squeeze excitation-based compound scaled path, an asymmetric lateral connection-based bottom-up path, and a discriminator module that distinguishes between original and synthetic masks. A morphology-based smoothing loss is also implemented to encourage the network to create smooth semantic boundaries of lesions. The framework is evaluated on the International Skin Imaging Collaboration Lesion Dataset. It outperforms the current state-of-the-art skin lesion segmentation approaches with a Dice coefficient, Jaccard similarity, and accuracy of 90.1%, 83.6%, and 94.5%, respectively. We also design a lightweight segmentation framework called Mobile-GAN (MGAN) that achieves comparable performance as EGAN but with an order of magnitude lower number of training parameters, thus resulting in faster inference times for low compute resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.