Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596301›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

BLINK enables ultrafast tandem mass spectrometry cosine similarity scoring.

Thomas V Harwood, Daniel G C Treen, Mingxun Wang, Wibe de Jong, Trent R Northen, Benjamin P Bowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Comparative analysis of continuous similarity measures for compound identification in mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.Chemometrics and intelligent laboratory systems : an international journal sponsored by the Chemometrics Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The endophytic fungusCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Tandem Mass Spectrometry across Platforms.Analytical chemistry · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas V HarwoodEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, The DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Daniel G C TreenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, The DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Mingxun WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California Riverside, 900 University Avenue, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Wibe de JongComputational Chemistry, Materials and Climate Group, Computational Research Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Trent R NorthenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, The DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA.
Benjamin P BowenEnvironmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, The DOE Joint Genome Institute, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. bpbowen@lbl.gov.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics has a long history of using cosine similarity to match experimental tandem mass spectra to databases for compound identification. Here we introduce the Blur-and-Link (BLINK) approach for scoring cosine similarity. By bypassing fragment alignment and simultaneously scoring all pairs of spectra using sparse matrix operations, BLINK is over 3000 times faster than MatchMS, a widely used loop-based alignment and scoring implementation. Using a similarity cutoff of 0.7, BLINK and MatchMS had practically equivalent identification agreement, and greater than 99% of their scores and matching ion counts were identical. This performance improvement can enable calculations to be performed that would typically be limited by time and available computational resources.

Identifiers

PMID37596301
PMCPMC10439109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.