Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37596048›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2023

Activity of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata during Saccade Adaptation.

Yoshiko Kojima, Daisuke Koketsu, Paul J May

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 85% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoshiko KojimaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 ykojima@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0777-3308
Daisuke KoketsuDivision of System Neurophysiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan.
Paul J MayDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Education, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216.
National Institute for Physiological Sciences · JPUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
A neuronal process of the error signal that drives saccade adaptationR01EY023277 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KOJIMA, YOSHIKO · 2013 to 2021
$4.0M
Neural mechanisms of motor adaptation for an internally driven movementR01EY033760 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Yoshiko Kojima · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023277NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033760NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When movements become inaccurate, the resultant error induces motor adaptation to improve accuracy. This error-based motor learning is regarded as a cerebellar function. However, the influence of the other brain areas on adaptation is poorly understood. During saccade adaptation, a type of error-based motor learning, the superior colliculus (SC) sends a postsaccadic error signal to the cerebellum to drive adaptation. Since the SC is directly inhibited by the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNr), we hypothesized that the SNr might influence saccade adaptation by affecting the SC error signal. In fact, previous studies indicated that the SNr encodes motivation and motivation influences saccade adaptation. In this study, we first established that the SNr projects to the rostral SC, where small error signals are generated, in nonhuman primates. Then, we examined SNr activity while the animal underwent adaptation. SNr neurons paused their activity in association with the error. This pause was shallower and delayed compared with those of no-error trial saccades. The pause at the end of the adaptation was shallower and delayed compared with that at the beginning of the adaptation. The change in the intertrial interval, an indicator of motivation, and adaptation speed had a positive correlation with the changes in the error-related pause. These results suggest that (1) the SNr exhibits a unique activity pattern during the error interval; (2) SNr activity increases during adaptation, consistent with the decrease in SC activity; and (3) motivational decay during the adaptation session might increase SNr activity and influence the adaptation speed.

Indexed as

Pars ReticulataAnimalsBrainCerebellumSaccadesSuperior Colliculiadaptationlearningmonkeysaccade

Identifiers

PMID37596048
PMCPMC10500979
OpenAlexW4385971439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.