Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37595594›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2023

A Study of the Current Scenario of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Marina Martinelli Sonnenfeld, Alexandre Massao Nozaki, Anelise Silva de Genova, José Ricardo Weitz Ristow, Tamiris Ferreira de Moura, Rayanne Pereira Cabral, João Victor Almeida Garcia, Camila Abdias Guimarães, André Luiz Malavasi Longo de Oliveira, Rossana Pulcineli Vieira Francisco

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Marina Martinelli SonnenfeldCentro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9415-0306
Alexandre Massao NozakiCentro de Referência da Saúde da Mulher, Hospital Pérola Byington, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-0088
Anelise Silva de GenovaAssociação Lar São Francisco de Assis na Providência de Deus, Hospital Regional de Presidente Prudente, Presidente Prudente, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0709-3994
José Ricardo Weitz RistowCentro de Referência da Saúde da Mulher, Hospital Pérola Byington, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7339-8625
Tamiris Ferreira de MouraPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0835-5319
Rayanne Pereira CabralUniversidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho," Botucatu, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3818-711X
João Victor Almeida GarciaHospital Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4481-9347
Camila Abdias GuimarãesHospital Municipal Doutor José de Carvalho Florence, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6378-512X
André Luiz Malavasi Longo de OliveiraCentro de Referência da Saúde da Mulher, Hospital Pérola Byington, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0972-7380
Rossana Pulcineli Vieira FranciscoFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6920-7067
Hospital da Mulher São Paulo · BRFaculdade de Medicina do ABC · BRHospital Geral de Bonsucesso · BRHospital Municipal São José · BRHospital Regional de Presidente Prudente · BRPontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the residency of gynecology and obstetrics in São Paulo.

methodsCross-sectional study developed by representatives of residents of the Association of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the State of São Paulo (SOGESP, in the Portuguese acronym). Data were collected from questionnaires applied to gynecology and obstetrics residents registered on the SOGESP website in February 2022. The interviewees answered about the repercussions of the pandemic on medical residency and whether they had technical and psychological support during the period.

resultsA total of 247 questionnaires were collected from residents of gynecology and obstetrics. The residents had an age of 28.3 ± 3 years old, and most of them were female (88.4%). The displacement to COVID care was reported by 62.34% of the students, but only 35.6% reported completely adequate personal protective equipment and only 7.7% reported complete theoretical and technical instruction to support these patients. Almost all of the interviewees stated that the gynecology sector was the most affected. The majority of the interviewees considered that the second-year residents had the greatest loss, and more than half of the residents in the 1

conclusionThe pandemic impacted the residency in greater proportion in outpatient clinics and gynecological surgeries, also interfering with the physician's desire to continue with the program.

Indexed as

COVID-19GynecologyInternship and ResidencyObstetricsAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37595594
PMCPMC10438960
OpenAlexW4385973741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.