ArticleMedical image analysis2023
Segment anything model for medical image analysis: An experimental study.
Article in Medical image analysis, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 150 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
150 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Review of applications of deep learning in veterinary diagnostics and animal health.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Pooled it
- A 25-Year Retrospective of the Use of AI for Diagnosing Acute Stroke: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Segmentation methods for quantifying X-ray Computed Tomography based biomarkers to assess hip fracture risk: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Pooled it
- SVF-net: A Dual-encoder Network with Adaptive Gated Fusion for Colorectal Polyp Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Detection-Guided ROI-Constrained Diffusion for Weakly Supervised White Blood Cell Segmentation: A Retrospective Internal and External Dataset Evaluation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Multicenter Validation of Foundation Model Adaptation for Automated Pancreatic Tumor Delineation on CT Scans.Cancers · 2026Article
- LiT-WSAG: high-precision 3D liver tumor segmentation via 2D training and 3D reconstruction.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Glioma Segmentation on Multicenter 2D-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Rank Adaptation Tuning of a Foundation Model: An External Test Evaluation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging frontiers and challenges of artificial intelligence in PSMA-PET imaging: pioneering a new chapter in prostate cancer care.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Toward AI-Assisted Precision Diagnostics in Breast Cancer: Source-Group-Preserving Evaluation of Class-Imbalance Strategies for Ordered ER-IHC Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Robotic-referenced automated measurement of acetabular cup orientation on postoperative CT: development and internal validation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- A Prompt-Preserving SAM ViT-B Adaptation Framework with Historical Branch Fusion and Soft Convolutional Expert Weighting for Medical Image Segmentation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Uncertainty Quantification in Medical Image Segmentation: A Comprehensive Survey.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Language-Guided Segmentation of Medical Images: A Review of Foundation Models.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Vehicle Autonomy to Ecosystem Intelligence: A Systematic Review of Dynamic Vision Architectures in Surface Mining Operations.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reasoning in machine vision by learning fast and slow thinking.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Prompt mechanisms in medical imaging: A comprehensive survey.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2026Review
- Leveraging large language models for gastrointestinal injury detection in athletes: a medical image analysis approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficient transformer integration in nnU-Net for liver tumor segmentation: an external validation study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
90 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Training segmentation models for medical images continues to be challenging due to the limited availability of data annotations. Segment Anything Model (SAM) is a foundation model trained on over 1 billion annotations, predominantly for natural images, that is intended to segment user-defined objects of interest in an interactive manner. While the model performance on natural images is impressive, medical image domains pose their own set of challenges. Here, we perform an extensive evaluation of SAM's ability to segment medical images on a collection of 19 medical imaging datasets from various modalities and anatomies. In our experiments, we generated point and box prompts for SAM using a standard method that simulates interactive segmentation. We report the following findings: (1) SAM's performance based on single prompts highly varies depending on the dataset and the task, from IoU=0.1135 for spine MRI to IoU=0.8650 for hip X-ray. (2) Segmentation performance appears to be better for well-circumscribed objects with prompts with less ambiguity such as the segmentation of organs in computed tomography and poorer in various other scenarios such as the segmentation of brain tumors. (3) SAM performs notably better with box prompts than with point prompts. (4) SAM outperforms similar methods RITM, SimpleClick, and FocalClick in almost all single-point prompt settings. (5) When multiple-point prompts are provided iteratively, SAM's performance generally improves only slightly while other methods' performance improves to the level that surpasses SAM's point-based performance. We also provide several illustrations for SAM's performance on all tested datasets, iterative segmentation, and SAM's behavior given prompt ambiguity. We conclude that SAM shows impressive zero-shot segmentation performance for certain medical imaging datasets, but moderate to poor performance for others. SAM has the potential to make a significant impact in automated medical image segmentation in medical imaging, but appropriate care needs to be applied when using it. Code for evaluation SAM is made publicly available at https://github.com/mazurowski-lab/segment-anything-medical-evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.