Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37595359›Full record

ArticleBlood2023

Fractionated vs single-dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin with determinants of benefit in older patients with AML: the UK NCRI AML18 trial.

Sylvie D Freeman, Abin Thomas, Ian Thomas, Robert K Hills, Paresh Vyas, Amanda Gilkes, Marlen Metzner, Niels Asger Jakobsen, Alison Kennedy, Rachel Moore and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Sylvie D FreemanInstitute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1869-180X
Abin ThomasCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8283-6762
Ian ThomasCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Robert K HillsNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paresh VyasWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3931-0914
Amanda GilkesCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Marlen MetznerWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1806-0952
Niels Asger JakobsenWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5776-5085
Alison KennedyWellcome, Medical Research Council Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6681-3256
Rachel MooreWeatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-9595-7786
Nuria Marquez AlmuinaCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Sarah BurnsCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Sophie KingCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Georgia AndrewLaboratory of Myeloid Malignancies, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Kathleen M E GallagherCellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Rob S SellarUCL Cancer Institute and University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Paul CahalinBlackpool Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Blackpool, United Kingdom.
Duruta WeberOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mike DennisThe Christie National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Priyanka MehtaThe University of Bristol and Weston National Health Service Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8561-1705
Steven KnapperCardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6405-4441
Nigel H RussellGuy's and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Cardiff University · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBNational Health Service · GBHarvard University · USNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000729Medical Research Council MC_PC_19049Medical Research Council MC_U137961146Medical Research Council MC_UU_00016/11Medical Research Council MC_UU_00029/8Medical Research Council MC_UU_12009/11Medical Research Council MR/L008963/1Medical Research Council MR/R002258/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Addition of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to induction chemotherapy improves outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but it is uncertain whether a fractionated schedule provides additional benefit to a single dose. We randomized 852 older adults (median age, 68-years) with AML/high-risk myelodysplasia to GO on day 1 (GO1) or on days 1 and 4 (GO2) of course 1 induction. The median follow-up period was 50.2 months. Although complete remission (CR) rates after course 1 did not significantly differ between arms (GO2, 63%; GO1, 57%; odds ratio [OR], 0.78; P = .08), there were significantly more patients who achieved CR with a measurable residual disease (MRD)<0.1% (50% vs 41%; OR, 0.72; P = .027). This differential MRD reduction with GO2 varied across molecular subtypes, being greatest for IDH mutations. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 29% for patients in the GO2 arm and 24% for those in the GO1 arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; P = .14). In a sensitivity analysis excluding patients found to have adverse cytogenetics or TP53 mutations, the 5-year OS was 33% for GO2 and 26% for GO1 (HR, 0.83; P = .045). In total, 228 (27%) patients received an allogeneic transplantation in first remission. Posttransplant OS was superior in the GO2 arm (HR, 0.67; P = .033); furthermore, the survival advantage from GO2 in the sensitivity analysis was lost when data of patients were censored at transplantation. In conclusion, GO2 was associated with a greater reduction in MRD and improved survival in older adults with nonadverse risk genetics. This benefit from GO2 was dependent on allogeneic transplantation to translate the better leukemia clearance into improved survival. This trial was registered at www.isrctn.com as #ISRCTN 31682779.

Indexed as

DaunorubicinLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAgedAminoglycosidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCytarabineGemtuzumabHumansUnited KingdomAminoglycosidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytarabineDaunorubicinGemtuzumab

Identifiers

PMID37595359
PMCPMC10667325
OpenAlexW4385972227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.